In reply to deepblue: Quote:
First of all, AVI and MPG are two very different formats.
|
Both are container formats, AVI can be pretty much everything.
Quote:
AVI is a more compressed format.
|
Nonsense, see above.
Quote:
It usually looks blurry and pixilated.
|
That's utter nonsense. Nowadays, AVI usually contains
MPEG-4 encoded video data which can offer far superior
quality than most MPG files will have. It's a question
of encoding quality anyway. MPEG-4 can look as good as
DVD video or better (if the original video source isn't a
DVD but something better of course).
Quote:
MPG on the other hand typically looks much better.
|
Most MPG files contain MPEG-1 video data which usually
looks like tihs compared to something better like MPEG-2
or MPEG-4. A few MPG files contain MPEG-2 data which may
look better than a highly compressed MPEG-4 video but it'll
be much larger in size (4x or more).
Quote:
This is because the frame rate of the video is almost double that of the AVI format.
|
WTF? The frame rate? Do you even know what that is? Maybe
you meant bitrate but that isn't true either. Videos typically use a frame rate of 24, 25 or 30 frames per second.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the format.
Quote:
Therefore MPG files will always be much bigger than AVI files.
|
This is not true and even if they're bigger, this doesn't
mean they look better. MPEG-1 looks far worse than MPEG-4
at the same file size. For example, an acceptable MPEG-1 takes at least 10 MiB per minute, MPEG-4 looks fine at 6 MiB per minute and usually even much better along with a higher resolution.