I'm an avid fan of legal adult movies. And I get really frustrated when "inventive" people who share legal videos insert keywords like "keywords edited by policy" into the file names just to catch more attention (from perverts). There are many legal files with such illegal names. (e.g. "Paris Hilton keywords edited by policy porn.avi" which would obviously be Paris Hilton herself and legal)

But I'm scared to download the less obvious ones because 1) I don't want to get disgusted and feel bad for the rest of the day 2) I don't want the cops on my door.

And sometimes the opposite is true, files with innocent ("disney") or vague file names ("teen girl") are actually child porn (like the other members have said), or are on the border line (naked young girls eating bananas but not having intercourse --clever thugs cover their own backs through the loopholes of the definition of "child porn"). Imagine the scenario: I put a file on my download list, go to school, and come back to find out that the videos are illegal, and what's more, several people have downloaded it from me. All of a sudden, I'm a "kiddie porn host". Scary scenario. Brrrrrr..

It's frustrating to have to avoid lots of legal movies because of "inventive" people, and even more frustrating to come home to see that the download I had been waiting for turned out to be disgusting child porn (I prefer to call it "child abuse and brutalisation"; "porn" sounds too "soft" for that kind of disgrace)
I'm glad to hear that the cops are after those who have tons of them, and not those who download one or two files by mistake.

And as for the comrade who said "stop the demand and you stop the supply"... This may be a little off-topic, but I'd like to share my opinion.

I wish it were that easy. A kiddie porn gang got busted in my country, kudos to our cops. (One of the members was a woman; how pathetic is that!) They were selling their "work" in the form of video cassettes. Shooting child pornography is risky business (even in East Europe or Asia ) and the penalties are severe. It's simply not worth the risk if all you want to do is show it to everyone on the web; there has to be a financial gain to counterbalance the risk. This is why I believe that most of the child pornography we see on the P2P networks are simply copies of cassettes that were sold to perverts long time ago. They probably decided to "share" them (how compassionate!) once they get tired of m........... to them for months. You can think of the files as "end-of-season sale". So I think the trick is to bust the monsters (the big fish) and their paying customers, which would be accomplished through strong intelligence, and not through going after small-time perverts on the p2p networks. The networks should definitely be monitored, but the focus should be on the physical "flesh-and-bone" gangs like the gang in my country. Allocating the majority of resources to track down cyber-perverts (who are spectators) would be a heedless waste of tax dollars.

Thanks for reading.

Edit: I see that the keywords I typed were "edited by policy". I honestly didn't mean to break the rules, they were just an example. Sorry if I did anything wrong. Basically I was trying to say that there are people who insert child porn keywords into the file names of legal files.

Edit 2: Dear underage girls, please don't do online strip shows to your boyfriends. And never agree to have him tape you during intimate moments.
1) Boys (especially at that age) cannot be trusted with such confidential material, you'll end up getting broadcast over the web. Not even sueing them will reverse the damage once thousands of people (possibly including your family and schoolmates) see you engage in provocative acts.
2) You are motivating pedophiles and giving them moral grounds ("Man, those young b****es are already ripe and begging for it!" mentality)
Protect yourself.