Quote:
Originally posted by cultiv8r
But I've also participated in a number of proposals (such as the common X-Try header, the proposed queue, the proposed connect-back [which is implemented in another client too] and a few other smaller things), and I am helping putting the Gnutella RFC together so it can be submitted to the IETF so it will be a true public-domain protocol (which has many benefits for Gnutella developers). |
O.K. There we go, thank you!
Those above things do qualify you as a Gnutella Developer in my opinion. I apologize for not taking into consideration those other things you have done.
I still think that until someone releases a client, it's not fair to say, post or represent themself as a Gnutella Client Developer. Meaning they shouldn't be able to vote for standards, or "pull their weight" saying they won't add this or that feature, like it will hurt their non-existant user base or something.
And no, this isn't totally directed at cultiv8r, there are some others who are stepping over the line lately, if there is a line that is.