View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old September 9th, 2002
Antaeogo Antaeogo is offline
Apprentice
 
Join Date: July 3rd, 2002
Posts: 9
Antaeogo is flying high
Default

Quote:
ive been using EAC + Lame high quality, but i didnt like the size of the files very much.
If file size is a concern, and you're willing to sacrifice quality or are unable to notice the difference, consider using a different switch. APS is designed to achieve transparent quality. r3mix was designed to make mp3s that sounded "perfect" to its' creator. Both with little regard for saving disk space.

--alt-preset standard -Y and --alt-preset fast standard both offer slightly lower bitrates in comparison to plain old --alt-preset standard. I've not done any comparitive tests, so I can't speak much about the resulting file sizes.

Or you can create mp3 files with an average bitrate (ABR), using the --alt-preset switch. Example:

--alt-preset 160

This will usually produce an mp3 file with similar/equal quality but uses less disk space than it's CBR counterpart.

Quote:
the kbps rate shown in winamp kept changing
That's because your making MP3 files with a variable, instead of a constant, bitrate.

Quote:
i have 550kbps mp3s now O_O (the kbps rate that WinXP shows in the folder).
That's just Windows Explorer/whatever improperly calculating the bitrate.

Quote:
is these things normal?
Yes.

Quote:
ill do some tests with this ogg too , lets see if i can notice any difference.
Please do share how things turn out for you. Especially with ogg.
Reply With Quote