![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Connection Problems Problems getting the LimeWire or WireShare program connecting to the Gnutella network.
(not about connecting to files, that is a Download/Upload Problems section issue.) Please supply system details as described in the forum rules.
Start here Suggestions to help you get connected, * try here first *, then see below (click on 'this' blue link) Did you FORGET something BEFORE you posted? If you post in this section you MUST provide these details: System details - help us to help you (click on 'this' blue link), else do not be surprised if your posting is ignored :) |
![]() |
| LinkBack ![]() | Thread Tools ![]() | Display Modes ![]() |
| |||
![]() I have a host running Limewire 4.0.8/Windows XP with a public IP address on a 768k upstream, 1500k downstream DSL line (no ports blocked). This machine quickly became an ultrapeer, and after about a day of uptime, in the connections tab, it says that I have: (0 Ultrapeers, 28 Peers, 29 Leaves, 0 Connecting, 0 Standard). It is my understanding that an UltraPeer is also supposed to connect to a few other UltraPeers in order to provide a wider view onto the network for the leaf nodes that the UltraPeer is servicing. So I started wondering why my UltraPeer on the DSL line doesn't have any connections to other UltraPeers. To investigate further, I connected my laptop (Limewire 4.0.8 on Mac OS 10.3.5) to my housemate's Comcast Internet connection, again with a public IP address and no ports blocked. This machine also became an UltraPeer fairly soon. After an hour or so, it had 29 Peers and 29 Leaves, and no UltraPeer connections. I then manually instructed my laptop to connect to my desktop's IP address. The connection was established quickly and remained connected, but on both the desktop and the laptop, Limewire's connection window showed that the connection between my two UltraPeers was actually a "Peer" connection using only the "Peer" protocol. I am wondering whether this is some kind of a bug in Limewire, or whether I just don't understand something about the way the protocol is supposd to work. Thanks, DrDeke |
| |||
![]() I noted this in the betas quite a while ago, but nobody thought it was a problem. I guess the terminology changes: Leafs connect to Ultrapeers, but Ultrapeers are called Peers when connecting to other Ultrapeers. So, it's not a change in function, just terminology. |
| |||
![]() Yeah. Like stief said, this is intended. We purposely didn't change the numbers to show "Ultrapeer: #" for leaf and "Peer: #, Leaf: #" for Ultrapeers so that we could easily track down any connection problems (ultrapeers having ultrapeers, leaves having peers or leaves, etc..). The use of the word 'peer' is just meant to help us differentiate an Ultrapeer -> Ultrapeer (which we call peer) and a Leaf -> Ultrapeer (which we call ultrapeer) and an Ultrapeer -> Leaf (which we call leaf). |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UltraPeer dropout problem | GooRoo | Open Discussion topics | 1 | May 21st, 2005 02:59 PM |
ultrapeer | vintagedork | LimeWire Beta Archives | 1 | March 10th, 2004 03:41 PM |
Ultrapeer | BaDbOy3998 | Connection Problems | 2 | May 13th, 2003 05:55 PM |
ultrapeer problem. | Unregistered | LimeWire Beta Archives | 61 | April 29th, 2002 10:35 AM |
what is ultrapeer? | cyberrat67 | General Windows Support | 0 | March 4th, 2002 12:02 PM |