Making money out of the gullible and screwing up people's machines.

But keep taking the tablets anyway the experts MacCentral interviewed for this story admit "that to date, they're unaware of any Mac OS X-specific virus or worm..."

rubaiyat,

there are more Mac clients within Gnutella not only Limewire, Limewire connects to gnutella if you think it is slow... you say Gnutella is slow so this isn´t a Limewire problem its a general problem. I moved it to our general p2p section because poisened is not only a Gnutella client because it connects to several networks. You can write "almost" all what you want about the clients here but you should post it in the right section and don´t wonder if some people disagree!

And ursula is also right because we have rules against spamming, you can say what you want BUT not in every second post/thread.

Almost every other webside is using similar rules...

Morgwen

Where did I say Gnutella is slow?

Honestly I am racking my brain to come up with a better parody of the misquotes and twisted interpretations than already exist here. But I can't.

I have already mentioned that I have tried 3 Mac Gnutella clients other than Poisoned, which is a multi-network client. btw Thanks for pointing out something I had already said myself, I might have missed it otherwise.

I am beginning to get the hang of "how not to spam".

As long as the remark is completely irrelevant, says nothing patently useful, makes non-specific generalised improbable claims as to everyone being happy with the product (except for a mentally unstable tiny minority), it is suitable to post.

See I have learnt something at last.

I don't expect other people to agree. I wouldn't learn much if I did.

Is that your expectation of acceptable postings?

In which case may I offer you a Tommy Cooper line:

I was getting in my car and this bloke says to me "Can you give me a lift?"

I said "Sure, you look great, the world's your oyster, go for it."

You said Limewire is slow, Limewire is using the Gnutella network ergo gnutella has to be slow, right?

Now you are kidding me, are you?

Read my post and tell me where I said that your post isn´t acceptable? I explained you some of our rules and mentioned that some people could disagree with your view, nothing about not acceptable. If your post wouldn´t be acceptable I would edit it.

If you are missing your post here is a link:

http://www.gnutellaforums.com/showth...threadid=24067

Yes you seem to be a master in misqouting!

Three mods replied to your posts all said you are spamming, so quit the discussion about it, you have to respect our rules.

Morgwen

P.S.:

A lesson in maths:

You wrote that you are using both clients at the same time. You wrote that you limited your connection to 256kbs this is 32kb right? You also wrote that poisened is downloading with 27kb and Limewire only with 1,5kb - 2kb... now we count:

32kb - 27kb = 5kb left now remember p2p networks need bandwidth for the search traffic - and you wonder why Limewire don´t download faster than 2kb? How could it if there isn´t more bandwidth left? Nice joke...

Morgwen

False logic. My Father is 80 and a slow driver, he drives a Ferrari, therefore Ferraris are slow!

Your logic is false mine not. Limewire can´t be faster than other Gnutella clients because they all use the same protocol. So all clients are almost as fast/slow as Limewire ergo Gnutella has to be slow, this is fact not false. You really should read how Gnutella works before you share your wisdom with us...

Morgwen

Again you don't listen or only read what you want to read.

I have run LimeWire on its own and Poisoned on its own as well as simultaneously, where I let LimeWire begin its searches/DLs first. LW's speed is low with or without any other network activity. Poisoned's speed is high no matter what. Although I can steal bandwidth from it by excessive browsing, as I would expect.

No, I read what I see not what is in your head...

Morgwen