![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion For anything which doesn't fit somewhere else (for PHEX users) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been using Phex on my Linux box for the past 3 weeks with no complaints. I'm surprised Phex isn't more popular since there are no other open source gui clients for linux. Anyways, I was wondering what the (near) future holds for Phex. Are there any plans to implement any of the features that everyone is dying for? I realise that stability is probably a priority, but from what I have experienced, it doesn't seem to be an issue. Here are the two features I am wondering about.
1. Instant Messaging/Chat (I'm not too fond of Gnucleus' or Defender's approach to this) 2. Segmented downloads from multiple hosts (To my knowlege, only XoloX has implemented this and I haven't gotten a chance to try it out, not sure if it runs under Wine) Any info would be great. Congrats/thanx are in order for Konrad and the Phex developers. Later. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first step in creating Phex was to strip Furi (it´s predecessor) from all chat and IRC capabilietes. This improved performance a lot and not many people have been missing them. So it´s not very likely we will integrate them again. Phex is for downloading files and only downloading them. If you want to chat there´s a wealth of fatastic programs out there, so just grab one of them.
The segmented downloads is truly a feature requested by many users and I will start looking into it as soon as my work pressure gets a little less. At the moment I have to do research and programming on JMS, RMI, EJB, CORBA, IIOP, J2EE in general and similar things all day so I am happy not to see too many lines of java-code in the evenings. But this will change and I will come back with a whole lot of new coding experience and funny ideas. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm anxious to see segmented downloading applied. As for the chat feature, I agree that an IRC tie in is not the way to go. What would be great (and seems like an easy implementation) would be a 1 on 1 messaging system where you could send a message to one person who was on your upload/download/host list (who is also using Phex of course). There is no need for chat rooms, I agree. But sometimes when using the gnutella network, you want to warn people that a file they are downloading isn't great quality, or that you have to stop they're downloads while you reboot etc etc, and I think an implementation of a 1 on 1 instant messaging system would do the trick. Just my opinion of course
![]() Hrmm, would it de difficult to make a separate messaging system that piggybacked on Phex??? Kinda like how AIMster piggybacked on AIM. Then (i'm assuming) it would not slow down the performance of phex and would be a separate entity for those who wanted it. If someone could tell me if it's possible, and how to do it...i just might start working on it. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [BUG] Phex 2.6.4.89 - phex window graphic corruption | pawelsz | General Discussion | 4 | September 18th, 2005 06:38 PM |
| skin development | AnDrEvAs | LimeWire 4 Skins help (note: LimeWire 5 cannot change skin !) | 0 | May 23rd, 2004 11:33 PM |
| CiteShare development | Duvel | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 3 | October 2nd, 2003 02:41 AM |
| Decentralized Host-Cache - Only PHEX has one - So Promote PHEX | Unregistered | General Discussion | 0 | January 31st, 2002 06:29 AM |
| Development Progress | swabby | Gnucleus (Windows) | 11 | May 31st, 2001 04:11 PM |