![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Discussion For anything which doesn't fit somewhere else (for PHEX users) |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
![]() Hi, currently the Gnutella client comparison table misses some information concerning Phex. Could anyone knowing better than me update this table or post the necessary information over here plz? Also, if anyone has a proposal to add one or more columns to that article (including the respective information for more than half of the clients on that list plz!), just tell me and I'll add it to that table. thanks in advance, Old
__________________ ![]() Shareaza forums - after a new attac back on old theme - Shareaza homepage ![]() <table align="center"><td>F**K THE MPAA! F**K THE RIAA! P2P WILL NEVER DIE! LONG LIVE THE HYDRA!!! (Quoted from torrentfreak.com) |
| ||||
![]() None responding to the request?
__________________ ![]() Shareaza forums - after a new attac back on old theme - Shareaza homepage ![]() <table align="center"><td>F**K THE MPAA! F**K THE RIAA! P2P WILL NEVER DIE! LONG LIVE THE HYDRA!!! (Quoted from torrentfreak.com) |
| ||||
![]() The only reason is that I overlooked your post — and I’m not perfectly sure on the details (and don’t want to dive into the source…). I think the QRP routing is Unicode compatible, but I’m not sure. The opposite applies for UDP Push Proxy (I think no, but I’m not sure).
__________________ ![]() -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
![]() I think that the four nat traversal options are redundant. A simple NAT with the respective options would be better, I think (I had to readup myself on the difference between using RUDP, NAT Traversal and NAT port mapping (I knew UPnP). Rather each client should include the options it has (vastly different, though the purpose is the same: better connection behind a NAT).
__________________ ![]() -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
![]() Hmmm... OK... any columns I should add?
__________________ ![]() Shareaza forums - after a new attac back on old theme - Shareaza homepage ![]() <table align="center"><td>F**K THE MPAA! F**K THE RIAA! P2P WILL NEVER DIE! LONG LIVE THE HYDRA!!! (Quoted from torrentfreak.com) |
| ||||
![]() On the long run (as soon as at least one more servent supports it) DHT would be a good candidate for its own row: Efficient searching by hash. But currently only LW and gtkg support it.
__________________ ![]() -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
![]() I disagree. Mojito is a separated network, as a client could operate on Mojito without operating on gnutella. Therefore there shouldn't be a row suggesting that both are the same resp. the DHT is part of gnutella.
__________________ ![]() Shareaza forums - after a new attac back on old theme - Shareaza homepage ![]() <table align="center"><td>F**K THE MPAA! F**K THE RIAA! P2P WILL NEVER DIE! LONG LIVE THE HYDRA!!! (Quoted from torrentfreak.com) |
![]() |
| |