Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Gnutella News and Gnutelliums Forums > General Gnutella Development Discussion
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 18th, 2002
Disciple
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2002
Posts: 10
RusselHarvey is flying high
Default

One of the reasons that many don't feel excited about eDonkey, besides its boring GUI, is becuase there are too many tricks (most undocumented) to go through before really take advantage of its powerful search and swarm file transfer.

When I first used eDonkey, I've got usually 1-5kb/s download speed, now with aids from the 'Bot' and server list and all the proper configuration, the speed can go up to 100 kb/s. The speed here, 50kb/s to 100kb/s, I meant is very stable, it remains this speed in hours.

When look into the list of sources that feed the download (of course, most are PARTIAL file), there are usually over hundred sources with a few of them transferring and the rest are in 'Queue' status.

Many also hate eDonkey due to the fact that it forces you to share partial file (those still in the middle of downloading), and purposely slow you down sometimes (conspiracy) to force you to stay on line longer and sharing, so a MP3 file may appear taking longer to download than Gnutella, but in case of a DivX, it will take much less time and give you more confidence to have it in a a short amout of time.

At the moment, all I need is eDonkey. Compare to what eDonkey can do, the rest of P2P world are really all jokes, take a look at http://www.sharereactor.com. However, the fear eDonkey may one day disappears is always there as it's a close source program, soon or later it will draw attention while it's becoming more and more a dominent deliver channel of the 'stuff' (luckily, not many tech media are paying attention to eDonkey's low profile status) That's why Gnutella needs to catch up and get the lead back while there is still chance.

Last edited by RusselHarvey; May 18th, 2002 at 02:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://www.gnutellaforums.com/general-gnutella-development-discussion/11328-partial-file-sharing-protocol-development.html
Posted By For Type Date
Firefox : Partial File Sharing Protocol (???????? ?????? ??????? ?????) | FireFox 3 This thread Refback November 15th, 2011 07:48 PM
LimeWire Gnutella - LimeWire This thread Refback August 23rd, 2011 04:21 AM
Partial File Sharing Protocol (???????? ?????? ??????? ?????) | ????? Mozilla ?????? This thread Refback April 26th, 2011 09:27 AM
Partial File Sharing Protocol ( ). : LiveInternet - - This thread Refback March 7th, 2011 11:20 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partial File Sharing in LW! et voilà LimeWire Beta Archives 26 July 6th, 2003 01:04 PM
Organize new protocol development Etzi General Gnutella Development Discussion 3 March 16th, 2002 01:38 PM
partial file sharing and other questions Unregistered LimeWire Beta Archives 4 January 21st, 2002 10:31 AM
Release partial file sharing protocol GnutellaFan XoloX Feature Request 2 September 13th, 2001 05:39 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.