![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() i know this one would be better of to the gdf but i dont bother to register with yahoo. its also possible that something like this is already considered but the gdf is keeping their stuff closed so... anyway, the current situation is that 80% of the traffic is queries. some gnutella clients can show the current bandwidth usage in kb. per node this is around 0.7kb/sec - 1.5kb/sec. this number is misleading. please take a look at http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc791.txt and http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc793.txt for a search request that has a 18 byte header and a 10byte search string you get around 40 bytes of overhead and thats not taking the lower level protocols into acount (PPP, TCP ACK`s..) so i propose a new packet type that wraps several smaller query packets into one big packet. packet example: 16 byte guid 1 byte function: some yet unused function 1 byte ttl: 0 1 byte hops: 0 4 byte payload: sum of sub packets size. and then all the small query packets. a modem user could handle a lot more queries when they are packed like this. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[0.7 proposal] Count search replies | arne_bab | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 5 | November 8th, 2002 09:04 AM |
Gnutella Protocoll v0.7 Proposal | Moak | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 41 | August 17th, 2002 10:55 AM |
Proposal for development of Gnutella (hashs) | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 61 | April 17th, 2002 08:35 AM |
My Proposal for XoloX!!! | Unregistered | User Experience | 1 | February 6th, 2002 08:11 AM |
---a Radical Proposal--- | Unregistered | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 0 | September 21st, 2001 12:08 PM |