![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
| |||
![]() Thank you, that helps! When you say "hub" it's synonymous to servent/peer, I assume. So it is really that simple: caches remove IPs from the list in the same order they entered. My first impression is that this is beautifully simple, but is it very efficient? Because some peer stay online for years, others maybe just for seconds. EDIT: I just remembered reading a paper researching the average uptime (online time) of Gnutella peers. If I remember correctly a great majority of the peer were online several days. So the values of "year" vs. "seconds" I mentioned are rare stray offs without much influence. Regards, Alex Last edited by alex96; July 11th, 2009 at 03:56 AM. |
| ||||
![]() Quote:
As it takes only some seconds-minutes until the lists are refreshed completely, this assures that only nodes that have become Hub/UP within the last seconds are promoted for new nodes searching IPs to connect to. mfg, Old
__________________ ![]() Shareaza forums - after a new attac back on old theme - Shareaza homepage ![]() <table align="center"><td>F**K THE MPAA! F**K THE RIAA! P2P WILL NEVER DIE! LONG LIVE THE HYDRA!!! (Quoted from torrentfreak.com) |
![]() |
| |