![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella and the Gnutella network. For discussion about a specific Gnutella client program, please post in one of the client forums above. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() A lot of people want-to-be part of a particular group, it's a status or a belonging thing. So it's understandable human nature. Being called a "Gnutella Developer" carries a certian status and respect that is only deserved to those who have done the actual work, in my opinion. My question is: If someone talked about making a client, but hasn't ever produced a actual working Gnutella client, would you be able to call them a Gnutella Developer? On the other hand, if someone had a "pre-release-alpha-testing" version that worked even a little but was never improved, I think that would qualify developer status. Where do you draw the line? Talk is cheap, writing good working code is hard. I am just wondering what other people think about this. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for hardcore P2P developer | erichaddad | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 0 | June 13th, 2006 01:17 PM |
Gnutella Developer Chat on IRC | Moak | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 20 | August 30th, 2002 04:41 PM |
[In the News] Gene Kan, Gnutella Developer, Dies at 25 | xyz | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 1 | July 20th, 2002 04:07 PM |
New Project and new Developer | hughesdr | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 1 | May 12th, 2002 01:45 AM |
any gnutella DEVELOPER forums? | Tomato | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 1 | April 24th, 2001 02:31 PM |