Gotta love the law here in Kentucky -- you can have sex with a girl on her 16th birthday and it is all legal, but you can't snap a photo of her for another 2 years.

Added edit for those who like to twist things out of context: The point of the above statement is to illustrate (with a sarcastic flair) the manner in which laws don't line up with each other. It would seem that taking photographs of a 16 year old would be less of an issue than having sex with her, if one were simply looking at this from a logical point of view. But the law is completely reversed on this matter. (In Kentucky, it is legal for anyone of any age above 16 to have sex with any other willing person who is also over the age of 16; however, it is not legal to take a provocative picture --e.g. nudity -- of a person until he/she is at least 18 years of age.) For those out there who want to twist my statements to say something that they don't actually say -- I am NOT advocating any sort of improper activity with anyone of any age.

can a child be charged for pedophile laws?
i mean its normal for kids to want to see other kids. its natural

is it wrong fora kid to be seeing this
its natural that a kid would want to see another kid. so can a kid get in trouble with pedophile laws?

these last 3 posts rather disturb me...maybe I don't quite get the point of me112233, but I think mr. animal needs to take a bus about 15 miles south and stay there....

__________________


So Long and Thanks for All the Files
_____________________________________________

Beware of the big 3 insurance companies in Texas! Read your policies carefully (maybe you'll need a lawyer) Allstate, Farmers & State Farm are overextended and their 'coverage' is worthless...a true waste of your money Read This

As far as I can tell there has never been an exemption for young offenders in pornography laws.

In the UK is possession and arrest only proved by actually finding the material on the persons computer, or can records/logs from things like the gnutella network be used to convict entirely by themselves?

Look up some recent cases. I don't think any lawyers from the UK hang out here. ;]

Beez

As a UK resident you should be aware of the following case:

BBC NEWS | England | Kent | Langham sentenced over child porn


UK Bob

PS. If you want answers to questions only a solicitor can answer then ask a solicitor.

I dont think he was using any p2p software, he paid for it and he was found in possession and used "research" as an excuse, doesnt really wash does it

they can't be downloaded right, even if there are search results with KP vids they dont start downloading! so there's no problem at all!
i also possess a got damn KP vid, i downloaded a [edit] and its a got damn kiddy PPPPPPRRRN!!!!!
and now i cant download any vid that has a [edit] results!


__________________________________________________
Edited to comply with the House Rules.
Warez, copyright violation, or any other illegal activity may NOT be linked or expressed in any form.