|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella and the Gnutella network. For discussion about a specific Gnutella client program, please post in one of the client forums above. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
No not at all. I dont really believe that gnutella is far behind technology. All the other File Sharing programs have some part which is centralized where gnutella isnt. Gnutella is different than other networks and realize that gnutella is a protocol and not just a file sharing network. The potential for gnutella goes way beyond file sharing. Its a young protocol still it has made some good progress in the past year, the outlook for improvements to the network are looking even better now than a year ago. Theres newer programs and new developers coming to gnutella than ever before most of which are with commerical interests.. The only problem with gnutella is that areas like the GDF are kinda hidden away on yahoo and infomation isnt very well organized and easy to access and find for newer developers. But things are pretty fair, documentation of proposals are freely avaible, no one is left out at the gdf unless they choose not to go which thats their decision so they cant really complain about the outcome, and programs are working together to improve the network. Things like clumping together of servents and etc. arent that bad it lets developers add some unique features to there programs without affecting the network too much or because its not supported by the rest of the network. In the end a person can still download off of them and that is what matters. If you want to stick to the issues and not bring in program poltics then i have no problem with discussing gnutella with you or anyone else.. Quote:
|
| |||
New linux OpenSource P2P client - gtk-frutella |
| |||
This reminds me of the free speech movement at berkley. Up till now you had no choice to be able to support commercial third parties or not, now you do. It will be up to the users what clients they block. So now you better behave properly in front of the users or lose your "market share". Cluster, spam or spy on people and you are blocked! How's that for competition? Moak, you have always had good ideas about the protocol and improvement. Not all ideas can be added or adopted but you do spark good thinking towards new features so keep it up. You have a good point about fasttrack, we should talk more about what features they have that might be easily added to Gnucleus. Tell me what you have found that we can add. Quote:
OK, so Morgwen hates Sephiroth and Sephiroth hates Morgwen, we get it, we got it. You both have different points of view, good. We get that too. So now, what about the subject at hand? A "Socialist-type structured gnutella" may be a bit far since most socialist structures people have seen this century include greed, a "upper class" of people so it falls apart. I am worried that we have another commercial interest in Morpheus and we haven't yet seen how bad it can get, depending on how bad this new guy is. So let's stop it now before it gets so bad we can't stop it. The newer Gnucleus version of this is almost done now, I am just testing it a bit more. You will like it. Well, most of you will. It gives you a choice you didn't have before. Sephiroth wisdom: "The users choose which ones survive and which ones fail thats the "invisible hand" at work.. " OK, so you do agree with us! |
| |||
Quote:
|
| |||
Quote:
If the feature was released in source code form everyone could use it and thus no clumping would be required and that would be better for the network and everyone on it. |
| |||
lots of dropped packets I'm trying the gtk-frutella client I posted at http://www.linuks.mine.nu/gtk-frutella and I'm seeing a lot of dropped packets. Is this a problem for gnucleus users as well? I'm not getting very good search results, but can download and see searches going by. I think this is the hostcache's fault 24.234.19.159:6347 because it was working OK for me for the last few days, and I got someone else to try it .. they got the same result. Is it because the hostcache is overloaded? Can more people post their IPs in the ip thread please? Preferably 24 hr users .. I am on a 4-hour modem connection, so won't post mine. |
| |||
Quote:
Hope the real world doesn't crush you too bad when (if) you ever get out into it. |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
opensource | WattsTech | General Discussion | 4 | October 7th, 2002 02:35 AM |
Gnucleus users, welcome to the OpenSource P2P Net! | Anonnn | Gnucleus (Windows) | 39 | April 18th, 2002 08:27 PM |
Qtella users, welcome to the OpenSource P2P Net! | Unregistered | Qtella (Linux/Unix) | 4 | March 29th, 2002 12:27 PM |
Introducing the OpenSource Network! | Anonnn | BearShare Open Discussion | 32 | March 19th, 2002 10:25 PM |