OpenSource P2P Net Discussion Thread

This reminds me of the free speech movement at berkley.
Up till now you had no choice to be able to support commercial third parties or not, now you do.
It will be up to the users what clients they block. So now you better behave properly in front of the users or lose your "market share". Cluster, spam or spy on people and you are blocked!
How's that for competition?
Moak, you have always had good ideas about the protocol and improvement. Not all ideas can be added or adopted but you do spark good thinking towards new features so keep it up. You have a good point about fasttrack, we should talk more about what features they have that might be easily added to Gnucleus. Tell me what you have found that we can add.

Originally posted by Sephiroth
Also i would like to point out that you are not qualified nor do you have the right to telll me and the hundred of thousands of other gnutella users whats our best interest. Users are not stupid and need to be told what to do especially one person.

Then you agree that users need a choice, good.
OK, so Morgwen hates Sephiroth and Sephiroth hates Morgwen, we get it, we got it. You both have different points of view, good. We get that too.

So now, what about the subject at hand?

A "Socialist-type structured gnutella" may be a bit far since most socialist structures people have seen this century include greed, a "upper class" of people so it falls apart.
I am worried that we have another commercial interest in Morpheus and we haven't yet seen how bad it can get, depending on how bad this new guy is. So let's stop it now before it gets so bad we can't stop it.
The newer Gnucleus version of this is almost done now, I am just testing it a bit more. You will like it. Well, most of you will. It gives you a choice you didn't have before.

Sephiroth wisdom: "The users choose which ones survive and which ones fail thats the "invisible hand" at work.. "
OK, so you do agree with us!