![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Mac OSX Support For general issues regarding Mac OS X users |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() Hello to all of you ! Concerned version 2.5 to 2.7.13 + I was one of the Unexspectedly quiting people but after i instaled limewire on my girlfriend's iBook 14 (os x 10.2.3 - 384 ram) i realized she WAS NEVER UNEXSPECTEDLY QUITTING ! and tried to understand why i was crashing every 5 min... on a G4 867 (10.2.3) with 1.25 gig of ram... I must add that my G4 was quite stable with all other programs (exept Mozilla) and almost never a kernel panic. the answer to this is a simple Ram chip... just removing one of my 512 ram module and now everything if 100% fine and STABLE... It seems Jaguar is so stable it is able to survive even with a defect ram module but java seems to be much less able to forgive such a defectuous component. Try the same method and if it works for you ... HURRAY !!!! |
| |||
![]() It could be that Jaguar doesn't care much about memory quality since applications need to deal with their memory issues. Java applications do not have to do as much to manage the memory such the Java environment deals with it. Since the environment applies to all Java applications one would think the Java runtime does all of that good memory stuff for every application. When doing so it finds the bad memory faster. |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
quits unexpectedly | hotgreentomato | Open Discussion topics | 0 | August 7th, 2005 10:08 AM |
9.2.2 Limewire quits, and quits. | BKinzey | General Mac Support | 6 | July 3rd, 2003 08:25 AM |
Quits often | Unregistered | General Mac OSX Support | 3 | December 10th, 2002 08:11 PM |
error 2, then quits | Unregistered | General Mac Support | 10 | April 20th, 2002 11:06 PM |
searched for iexplore found X>50 sites cookies.txt found x>3000 sites | reimer_sr | Open Discussion topics | 0 | August 27th, 2001 06:12 PM |