![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Gnotella (Windows) Gnotella has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead. |
![]() |
| LinkBack ![]() | Thread Tools ![]() | Display Modes ![]() |
|
| |||
![]() I periodically get the following non-fatal error when searching - sometimes repeatedly: Sock X Error 24053 Connection was aborted due to timeout or other failure 1False (where X is some number) Gnutella 0.6.6, Windows NT Workstation 4.0 SP5 |
| |||
![]() I've noticed that ALL reports of the debug messages bug has been from people running Windows NT/2K. Shaun has a laptop with Win2K Pro running on it, and says he hasn't encountered the problem. At this point, this is really the only bug we havn't addressed and have NO idea what is causing this (because we can not duplicate it). We're totally lost on this one... I guess as a last-ditch effort if we don't find it, Shaun could add a "do not display 32xxx errors" to toggle that range of error messages on/off. -Yytrium- [This message has been edited by Yytrium (edited 06-27-2000).] |
| |||
![]() >[QUOTE]Originally posted by Yytrium: >[B]I've noticed that ALL reports of the >debug messages bug has been from people >running Windows NT/2K. NOT THIS ONE.... I am using Windows 98 and FREQUENTLY get an error message stating "Sock X (x is often 20 or 21) 24050 network subsystem has failed 1false". A similar message will appear shortly afterward for every file being transferred. The software must then be forceably terminated. FYI I am running a Zonealarm firewall, and Sygate NAT software. Usually the software works, so it is clearly an intermittent problem and apparently not unique to NT or Win2k. Sorry guys :-) It may be more prevalent when I am conducting multiple searches, but I haven't tested this... |
| |||
![]() i too have experienced these messages in both win98 and win2k. I had assumed what was happening here was that as I limit the number of uploads, other users may still request uploads, and when an upload becomes available, they are gone or have aborted the request; thus a timeout error. Was this a faulty assumption? Can I help out with any more info? btw, I still think its the best gnutella client out there! |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Socket error | Unregistered | Support: General | 2 | June 25th, 2002 03:21 PM |
Invalid socket specified | Unregistered | Qtella (Linux/Unix) | 0 | June 21st, 2002 03:04 AM |
socket error? | Unregistered | Gnotella (Windows) | 1 | July 15th, 2001 08:31 PM |
Killing Socket Error | nojmit | Gnotella (Windows) | 4 | June 26th, 2001 01:35 PM |
Cant connect, socket 0 buffer 0 | cosmicchrl | Gnotella (Windows) | 4 | December 6th, 2000 12:37 PM |