![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Gnucleus (Windows) For assistance for users with the Gnucleus program. Important links: Updated Gnucleus 2.2.0.0 Installer! and also Updated Connection Caches for Gnucleus! |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() Looking though the code it seems like (big maybe) this will only respond to clients that have X-Query-Routing 0.1 in the connect header and (or??) must have a ultrapeer false header. So what about no header? What about 0.2 ? if there is even a version 0.2 now, but what about later on? And what does it matter? if you route packets better than a old client, no need to tell everyone, just do it. Plus, what does this have to do with ultrapeers, is X-Query-Routing required to connect to a ultrapeer? just wondering if it's a bug that was overlooked or what. CString RoutingHeader = FindHeader("X-Query-Routing"); if(!RoutingHeader.IsEmpty() && RoutingHeader == "0.1") QueryRouting = true; |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Query Routing Protocol | Indipendent Developer | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 1 | March 11th, 2005 02:56 PM |
Writing Java client.. how should I implement query/query hits? | Tw|st3r | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 1 | December 26th, 2004 10:03 PM |
What is query-routing | Cakkie | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 3 | July 29th, 2002 05:27 AM |
help please- NAT routing | Unregistered | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 2 | April 1st, 2002 01:56 PM |
Beyond Gnutella: Query Routing | Moak | XoloX Feature Request | 0 | September 29th, 2001 05:56 AM |