Oldfashioned concept?
 

Isn't gtk-gnutella obsolete because it's programmed in C? It can't use STL or exchange code with other C++/OOP projects and will die in the end?

who uses gtk-gnutella anyway? 10 users, 20 users worldwide?

pffft, gtk-gnutella is sweet.


-------------
Happy user of gtk-gnutella 0.90.

at least one user, amazing. it's oldfashioned

Hey, show me something better (that does not run under java). :D :D :D

even Bearshare is better LOL

Something better :

Gnucleus, Shareaza, Bearshare, Atomwire (Gnucleus clone), Xolox, Morpheus (Gnucleus clone), Limewire, Mutella, Qtella, Phex, Napshare, Swapper...

few ones are worse.

Check your sources!
 

STOP!

You said Napshare is better than gtk-gnutella.

My poor friend, Napshare is a fork of gtk-gnutella at an earlier version that has not evolved much since!

How could it be better?

Goodbye, my friend!

-- Peer

peerogue, Napshare has 'AUTOMATION' feature, gtkgnutella not.

back to first poster. how many projects would you find on source forge not being OO, how many are still interesting?