![]() |
3.2.0 I just put 3.1.0 back in, ive been useing limewire since december and have had no problems. yesterday i downloaded 3.2.0 and since then i had really poor search results, and what i thought were slower downloads. I have cable, 1.5 toshiba laptop and havent changed anything significant since i first used limewire. I thought someting was strange when no one was uploading from me, as soon as i was back to 3.1 i saw uploads. What was that about? |
I have had few uploads with both 3.1.0 and 3.2.0. I see no difference between the two. I get perhaps 5 percent the uploads I got with older versions of Limewire. Another thing I notice is the searches are not grouping well. Same length same filename files return separately in the searches. Norm |
thats true, they didnt seem to group as well as before |
3.1 has a couple of bad bugs, I would advise you not to use it. |
something that works with bugs is better than something without that doesnt |
It doesn't work. 3.1 doesn't route QueryHits properly. All LimeWire versions from 2.9.something to 3.1 cannot be searched properly. |
Ah, the magic of system resore. 2.7.13 lives again |
Trap_jaw4 Are you getting a normal number of uploads on 3.2? I am getting the same results I saw with 3.1 Norm |
@jsn 2.7.13 polluted the download mesh with expired alternate locations (that could be weeks old). It didn't handle http download requests properly and all new ultrapeers (2.9.8+) will send you only half the number of results because they disadvantage old limewire clients. @Norm Make sure that you are not only using version 3.2 but that you are connected to 3.2 ultrapeers. |
Thanks Trap_jaw4 I will try that. Norm |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.