Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > LimeWire Beta Archives
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 4th, 2004
Aqualime *****
 
Join Date: December 1st, 2002
Location: A place with no Leachers
Posts: 86
Juggalo15 is flying high
Default Limewire 3.8.0

This version doesn't seem to have the little connection rating, has it been removed? Also wasn't all the even number releases previously stated by the Limewire team in a slyck interview i believe that even number releases were going to be final and odd were for beta testing? Last but not least get a change log up
  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 5th, 2004
Disciple
 
Join Date: January 12th, 2004
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 16
pcfrank is flying high
Lightbulb Changelog / Version History

Amen to the request to get a changelog up. Including a (version) history.txt file with the distribution, tracing back all changes from the program's creation, wouldn't be a bad idea, either.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 5th, 2004
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2003
Posts: 1,118
trap_jaw4 is flying high
Default

I don't really know why they removed it but they obviously did.

Last edited by trap_jaw4; February 5th, 2004 at 02:26 AM.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 5th, 2004
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

The connection quality indicator is in the 3.8.1 beta . . . and my connections are back to previous stablility so far. Wish I knew whether my ISP or LW gets the credit.

Ditto to the changelog.txt . Changelog please?
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 7th, 2004
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

in 3.8.1 the Advanced->Uploads->General->Interrupted stats shows 16,088 (8,187 Attempted) in 24 hrs.

just curious what this unusually high number is logging differently, since uploads seem to be proceeding as usual, if not better (average of 50KB/s out of 100 set limit).
  #6 (permalink)  
Old February 7th, 2004
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2003
Posts: 1,118
trap_jaw4 is flying high
Default

the number of interrupted downloads appears a little high indeed. They happen when TCP connections fail or are closed by the client for some reason.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 8th, 2004
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

thanks for the confirmation trap_jaw.

I tried to repeat the problem, but I'm still confused.

I thought maybe because one of the kids had been running Acquisition on another machine earlier, but since the firewalls are off and the router maps and forwards a different port to each machine, I didn't think that was a factor.

After 4 trials, all I can say is that it's not a 3.8.1 problem, and that I don't understand the effect of checking the option to Force IP.

Any suggestions for how to understand these numbers, esp. the drop in uploads?
Attached Images
File Type: png picture 3.png (6.1 KB, 227 views)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old February 8th, 2004
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2003
Posts: 1,118
trap_jaw4 is flying high
Default

The drop in uploads is easy to explain. Some hosts don't use your full upstream, so at times you may upload less although receiving the same number of requests.

If you were running as an ultrapeer, your upstream would be reduced even further.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old February 8th, 2004
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

Sounds reasonable--I guess it's pretty tough to keep as much as possible constant 'in the wild' but I've been sharing the same 1200 files for about a month, so the demand is pretty constant. btw, all 4 times were as an UP.

Thanks for taking a look. Any comment on forcing the IP (or not) since the router is mapped and forwarded and the computer's firewall off?
  #10 (permalink)  
Old February 9th, 2004
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

3.8.3 Pro wouldn't connect as an UP on my LAN unless I checked the force IP option.

So . . . while trying to connect as an UP with force IP checked/unchecked, I managed to repeat the problem of being a Leaf and an Ultrapeer (previously noted here http://www.gnutellaforums.com/showth...threadid=22591)

-- listing session information --
Current thread: AWT-EventQueue-0
Active Threads: 66
Uptime: 2:57:18
Is Connected: true
Number of Ultrapeer -> Ultrapeer Connections: 2
Number of Ultrapeer -> Leaf Connections: 1
Number of Leaf -> Ultrapeer Connections: 6
Number of Old Connections: 0
Acting as Ultrapeer: true
Acting as Shielded Leaf: true
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.