Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > LimeWire Beta Archives
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 18th, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile LW 1.6b

Could somebody please post this version again. I have just downloaded 2.1.3 and i didn't like it because it skip parts of songs and i was doing just fine with 1.6 and so if some can get it could u please help me? Please!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 18th, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I forgot to say I left my old 1.6b and now when i try to open it (ever since i downloaded 2.1.3) it gives me an error that says : java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:a.a.a.b.Main
Could u tell me what to do or at least post the 1.6b so i could reDL it.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 18th, 2002
Devotee
 
Join Date: January 26th, 2002
Posts: 25
scud is flying high
Default

uh....use winamp to play your mp3s. You can play the files while they're downloading. But of course, the file will have a weird prefix and they'll be in the Incomplete directory of your LimeWire installation directory. Then when its done downloading, it'll move the complete file to your Shared directory.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 18th, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

plz don't use 1.6b.
since that time limewire's network code has been greately improved and using 1.6b is very bad for the network.
give 2.2.0 a try once again
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 19th, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question Why is it 'bad' for the network

Why is 1.6 bad for the network? I bought 2.1.3 Pro and installed it on my computer, while leaving 1.6b in place. I didn't want to go back and re-install it if I didn't like the new version. Two questions I haven't seen explained ANYWHERE else so far are, 1) Why are all connections now outgoing only? Is this the way the ultrapeer system works? Under the old system if you didn't have any incoming, you wern't able to share. Which leads me to my second and more important question. 2) Why doesn't the newer 2.1.3 appear to be uploading / sharing as many files? When I'm on with 1.6, I have uploads within a few minutes, with 2.1.3, it will sit for up to 1/2 hour before uploading 1 file? Local searches are drastically different as well with about a 50 to 1 ratio between old version and new. I noticed one other user making this similar observation as well. She said her files were popular, and not being shared. I think the searches are better on the new version, but I think it's as much fun to share, and am wondering what gives??
  #6 (permalink)  
Old February 19th, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default REALLY "BAD" for the network?

i think this guys got a point i dont think its bad its just the same thing but an older version can someone tell me what this error is though?
THanx
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 19th, 2002
Devotee
 
Join Date: January 26th, 2002
Posts: 25
scud is flying high
Default Re: Why is it 'bad' for the network

Quote:
Originally posted by Unregistered
Why is 1.6 bad for the network? I bought 2.1.3 Pro and installed it on my computer, while leaving 1.6b in place. I didn't want to go back and re-install it if I didn't like the new version. Two questions I haven't seen explained ANYWHERE else so far are, 1) Why are all connections now outgoing only?
With the new network topology, client (leaves) only make outgoing connections to Ultrapeers. Ultrapeers are hosts with a sufficient amount of uptime and bandwidth. These act as some what of a proxy for clients (leaves). Meaning it decreases network traffic (queries, ping, and pongs) for the leaf by handling all the traffic that otherwise a host would normally consume.

Quote:

Is this the way the ultrapeer system works? Under the old system if you didn't have any incoming, you wern't able to share. Which leads me to my second and more important question.
[
Yes. Even with the old protocol if you did not have an incoming connection you could still share, because you were still receiving queries from the hosts you have an outgoing connection to.

Quote:

2) Why doesn't the newer 2.1.3 appear to be uploading / sharing as many files? When I'm on with 1.6, I have uploads within a few minutes, with 2.1.3, it will sit for up to 1/2 hour before uploading 1 file? Local searches are drastically different as well with about a 50 to 1 ratio between old version and new. I noticed one other user making this similar observation as well. She said her files were popular, and not being shared. I think the searches are better on the new version, but I think it's as much fun to share, and am wondering what gives??
You must remember LimeWire is the only gnutella client that has implemented the Ultrapeer protocol. In which I would say not all LimeWire users have switched to the new version, meaning they're are a fewer 0.6 (the new ultrapeer protocol) hosts compared to the 0.4 (older protocol) hosts. But that will soon change here in a few months when other clients start to implemenet the new protocol.

Last edited by scud; February 19th, 2002 at 05:08 PM.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.