I agree that a change log would be great. Now how about you guys buying LimeWire Pro, like I did, so they can afford to do a nicety like this?

Glad that you like the idea...I do believe that most of the "guys"(?) above have bought LW Pro.

It's hard to tell about the UNREGISTERED ones...

somedays they have LW Pro, somedays they don't!

Why don't YOU REGISTER so we can count YOU in as a LW Pro user?

I won't let this thread go to page TWO!
With more than 1000 views, there is an interest.

To-date, I have seen no answers (yet) as to why LW supporters are NOT informing us (GENERALLY)
as to what a "Newest" version of LW will (should) do that my current version does not.
Is it bringing us a new feature or is it a "bug" fix....and if so, bug fix for which platform?

I think that most LW users and LW PRO payers are NOT programmers or "beta" testers.
Downloading and installing new programs is (for us) a risky business
(please note the LW Forum threads devoted to this problem alone).

We (and I) just want to get free stuff.

WE (all) SHOULD HAVE A LimeWire CHANGE LOG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LW doesn't have to go back to the beginning...LW (1.0 beta?)....
JUST START ONE WITH THE NEXT RELEASE!
(and, of course, continue it from that point).

June 12th 2002:
With (now) 1122 "views" do only (12) LW users have a "reply" (opinion)?
Or, should this thread become a pole?
Or, am I keeping this thread prominent (only) for myself?
Or is it a none-issue for (most) LW users?

Yah, I've mentioned that a couple times - we DO need a log. Besides, even Gnucleus has a change log, and that's a one man project! I think a team of devs could EASILY throw together a one-kilobyte log, or even tack it to the readme. Anywhere!