Ya all should integrate a video player into it

Very, very bad idea - this would take development away from LW to constantly improve the video player, especially as there are lots of free players out there already.

Mind you, this idea has been put forward before and, quite rightly, rejected.



UK Bob

woa, when the hell did i vote on this poll? it says i did? wtf? lmao..

ditto to UK Bob.

(I was just able to vote UC, so )

As long as there will be no interoperable API that allows integrating any player or browser as component objects of applications, there's little chance it will appear.

Integrating only the audio player was already a big job, taking lots of resources, and something that still cannot be completed to support all audio formats (and there are still some MP3 and OGG internal formats that don't work with the builtin player).

So at most, such integration would just be a limited preview, and it won't replace a full-featured external player or browser.

Developing players takes CONSIDERABLE time and resources since years by lots of large companies or organizations, and it is still not finished.

The same will be true for mail agents, document readers (PDF and so... except for plain-text which could be integrated rapidly in limewire, if users did not ask immediately also support for an editor, or rich-text features...), and even image viewers (other than common viewers like GIF, JPG and PNG which could be integrated very rapidly in LimeWire).

For now the best integration is at the filesystem-level, with applications associated with file types.

So the good question is: do we really want limited players/viewers/browsers in LimeWire? Can we place reasonnable limitations about their capabilities, and still provide to users an easy access to more complete external applications without complicating too much the user interface?

__________________
LimeWire is international. Help translate LimeWire to your own language.
Visit: http://www.limewire.org/translate.shtml