The feature would demonstrate to users whether the file they are considering downloading has any Bizti information associated to that file.

To take it one step further this could be in the format of a green thumbs up if the bitzi indication was good (based on the indicated value) or a red thumbs down.

This would generally help in the indentification of potentially infected files.For an indication of how this could be useful, search software for ****** - there are 50 or so versions all rated 5 star however only 5 of them have bitzi information which indicates that they are infected files. In fact all 50 of them are infected.

Hope this was useful
__________________________________________________
Edited to comply with the House Rules.
Warez, copyright violation, or any other illegal activity may NOT be linked or expressed in any form.

There is no place to store the info. Would you want LW to use Bitzi to check each file in your search results? Sure, it's possible, but I wouldn't want to have to wait for the process to complete.

Better to use the Bitzi link and a little common sense. After all, even Bitzi doesn't check each file, they simply list comments. Have you not seen where one person says the file won't play, and another says it's perfect? Would that be a tumbs up, or down? How about a great video that is mis-named? And many videos are what the name says, but are of lesser quality.