Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > Open Discussion topics
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 20th, 2002
Gnutella Veteran
 
Join Date: April 6th, 2002
Posts: 100
sipher is flying high
Default Question about the source available through CVS

Is it no longer hte pro source? I knwo when I got 2.3.3 a couple weeks ago it was pro source. Now it doesn't say pro in the about field anymore it just says 2.4.0r Seems to have the file resume bug fixed but some of the options in preferences seem to be missing, like being able to set available upload slots and how much upload bandwidth to be used...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 21st, 2002
Gnutella Aficionado
 
Join Date: March 13th, 2002
Location: Aachen
Posts: 832
Taliban is flying high
Default

I have no idea why they changed the version number to 2.4.0r instead of 2.4.0pro, - but I don't think it means very much.

As for the options, you are missing, - they're still in the code, and I have already seen and used them in 2.4.0r.

I had a couple of lock ups with the cvs code, which usually occur after running limewire for 6-12 hours. Seen anything like that on your computer with 2.4.0r, yet?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 21st, 2002
Gnutella Veteran
 
Join Date: April 6th, 2002
Posts: 100
sipher is flying high
Default

No I just updated though cause acqualime runs slow as dirt for me and I wanted file resume capability back. I never could get (was it your fix?) to work on the old code. My upload supcatagory in the options didn't collapse when I clicked on it I guess, I finally found the options. No problems yet though except that every time I run it says there is a new version 2.3.3 I should upgrade to (that's really not new though) - anyway to turn that off?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 21st, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Version check

I blocked the version check by setting my firewall to block the java executable being able to connect to version.limewire.com (64.61.**.***) which is the same IP as Lime Wire » Official Website & Free Download, BitTorrent «

Last edited by 6_pac; February 8th, 2008 at 01:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 22nd, 2002
MamiyaOtaru's Avatar
Code Mangler
 
Join Date: March 25th, 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 143
MamiyaOtaru is flying high
Default

I turned off the upgrade check in the code. In Initializer.java comment out the line um.doUpdate();
ie, change
um.doUpdate();
to
//um.doUpdate();
and no more update.

2.4.0 does fix the resuming, but it uses obscene amounts of RAM, about twice as much as 2.3.4
Anyone else noticed anything similar?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old April 22nd, 2002
Gnutella Veteran
 
Join Date: April 6th, 2002
Posts: 100
sipher is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MamiyaOtaru


2.4.0 does fix the resuming, but it uses obscene amounts of RAM, about twice as much as 2.3.4
Anyone else noticed anything similar?
GAH! I just can't win, all I want is limewire with no resume bug and no adds. And I can't use acqualime cause that runs slow as dirt on my system!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old April 22nd, 2002
MamiyaOtaru's Avatar
Code Mangler
 
Join Date: March 25th, 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 143
MamiyaOtaru is flying high
Default

admittedly, aqualime is slower than limewire. But it is evel slower still with java 1.4.0

You would notice a nice speed boost if you used java 1.3.1 with aqualime instead.

(This is due to skinLF not yet being optimized for java 1.4.0. That should happen relatively soon) That still may not make it fast enough for you though, in which case, I sympathize

****EDIT**** That thing about 2.4.0 using more RAM was due to a mistake on my part. Having fixed that, I can't think of a reason not to use 2.4.0 compared to 2.3.?

Last edited by MamiyaOtaru; April 23rd, 2002 at 02:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need more source superfantastic Open Discussion topics 1 April 16th, 2007 05:45 PM
Help with source Petros Open Discussion topics 1 April 4th, 2007 12:27 AM
using source? Unregistered Open Discussion topics 1 October 30th, 2002 08:01 PM
Source compile question. Unregistered Open Discussion topics 7 September 23rd, 2002 05:32 PM
New Source Unregistered Download/Upload Problems 0 May 11th, 2002 09:14 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.