![]() |
Searching for shared files OK, first, I apologize, since I'm sure that this has been asked many times. However, I've done a number of searches that brought up tons of pages with irrelevant posts. Anyway, how do I search the network for my original files? I leave my clients running 24/7 (LW Pro 2.5.5, NapShare, or mutella) and I'm constantly serving files to people. A number of these files are original works and I would like to ensure that they are being shared - how do I do so? I've tried opening clients with no shared directory, alternate ip addresses (my NIC addy instead of the router addy (this, to see if my own computer will show up)), alternate ports, and web based Gnutella search sites, and I've never seen any of my files. Any recommendations on how to do this? Or should I just assume the files really aren't being shared? Moderators: I guess this should probably be moved to the General Gnutella Forum. I'm kind of curious how to do it with LimeWire though. |
Thanks bpmax. I understand that aspect of it - I'm really more interested in whether or not someone is sharing files that they have downloaded from me. I've just never seen any of the files when I do a search, and they have distinctive filenames. I suppose I might check that with a different computer eventually. |
Quote:
bad_vlad |
Quote:
bad_vlad |
Not necessarily. While I'm not 100% sure whether it applies to searching, most Gnutella clients won't even bother trying to download a file that you already have in your shared directory that has the same file name and file size. Therein lies our problem.... how - aside from using someone elses computer, do we do it? I've tried a number of ways (i.e., running a client without a (or with a different) shared directory, and it hasn't worked yet. |
ummmm - its not so much he download success/failure I'm interested in as the general search result window - shareaza has a cute feature whereby if a search hits upon a file somewhere else that I already have it shows the file greyed out (even though the file has been renamed the hashing feature means the file is recognised as identical to one I've dowloaded/ripped earlier) - just once in limewire I had the wiered experience of search requests I made resulting searches of my own hard drive and nothing else - it was kind've pointless but also kind've interesting seeing my (renamed) files come up but but but - apart from that one time I've never seen one of my files appear in the search results window even though my occupied upload slots mean files of mine should be about the place (unless every upload has been undertaken by folks who refuse to share them - unlikely, especially since I've set the freeloader filter at must be sharing at least 1 file) |
I noticed this behavior also, though sometime ago and I didn't try very hard. Essentially I searched Gnutella for some less common filenames a few months after sharing those files and didn't turn up anything. Two primary reasons how this happened is the people who I uploaded to are not connected or outside my horizon. Also, I may be connected to those I uploaded to but they deleted the file earlier. |
When I download a file, say an mp3 file, I ALWAYS change it to fit my needs. I do not have an "ear" for music and can not tell the difference between 64 and 128 kbs. I am sure some people can, but it sound exactly the same to me. So, if it sounds the same, why take up the HD space when not necessary for my enjoyment. AND I most always change the tags to fit my needs also. A lot of times after importing it into my mp3 player the song title, album or something is not correct so I change it. If I downloaded a file from you, you would not find that song from me looking the same :) |
Quote:
on the other hand - if they really do sound the same to you I guess you can fit a truckload of music into a damn small space Cheers, bad_vlad |
Absolutely !!! - one kind've cute/odd thing I've discovered is that having an external sub-woofer in a wooden cabinet with attached speakers then placed quite high off the ground (like over a meter) really dramatically improves the sound (given that its the bass/depth thats often weak on an mp3 I s'pose) good to see other folks treating 128 as the very bottom end of acceptable - bad_vlad |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.