![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
| |||
![]() Does anyone know why my brother's PC gives him 40 hosts and my mac with MacOS 10.1.5 and Limewire 2.6.3 only gives 6 for exactly the same search. Even when I repeat the search it's the same. I am not pleased! |
| |||
![]() We checked that first. We each have it set for 6 peers, and we are both going through the same router to the same adsl line. He has a P4 PC and I have G3 Mac Powerbook. Both using the same version of Limewire which is the latest one. Any other ideas? |
| |||
![]() It's got to be more than luck. My brother's PC consistently gets more search results with more hosts for each item than I do on the Mac. I ought to contact the Limewire developers and put this question to them, but not sure where I can reach them, or even if they will note the queries of such lowly persons as myself. |
| ||||
![]() Maybe you should post this problem in the LimeWire forum which you can find on www.gnutellaforums.com too. Most LimeWire developers don't look at the General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion boards. |
| |||
![]() Because of Gnutella's size, the nodes you connect to is fairly "random". It's not truely random, because there's always a chance multiple nodes connect to the same node. But apparently, in your case this didn't happen when you tested it. So, when your PC connected to a number of nodes, they may have had connections to other nodes who had plenty of the files you were looking for. On the other hand, by pure chance, your MacOS connected to a number of nodes that didn't share much (of what you were looking for). Its partially a design flaw (because this possibility CAN be reduced a bit), but its also a "user fault" (as in: users leeching instead of sharing). Since the MacOS and PC version of Limewire have exactly the same Gnutella cores, there's otherwise no difference - except for performance based on the connection of each computer, and the system configuration. |
| |||
![]() Thanks for that info. However, this problem of fewer nodes appearing for a given file search on the Mac compared to on the PC happens on every search all the time, and therefore although your explanation makes some sense I feel there has to be some other explanation, especially if the Limewire core is the same on both platforms. |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A few things to consider while configuring Limewire for optimal performance... | murasame | Open Discussion topics | 320 | March 8th, 2013 03:26 AM |
Limewire Performance: OS X v. Windows | rogermhsu | General Mac OSX Support | 9 | March 18th, 2007 12:23 AM |
Limewire Optimal Performance Settings | 2pac_77 | Getting Started Using LimeWire + WireShare | 3 | October 18th, 2006 04:29 PM |
Poor Performance (Limewire Pro) | saycoda | Open Discussion topics | 4 | December 11th, 2005 11:35 AM |
JRE LimeWire Performance Enhancement | dieu | Windows | 4 | September 25th, 2002 06:13 AM |