![]() |
damn, kiddie porn is a gr8 problem and evil! i would catch and kill those who do harm to children and those who film it |
In the U.S. I can stand on the corner and yell "F... Y.." because protecting that speech also protects other speech such as political. My point being sometimes you have to take a little bad along with a ton of good. |
It is most unfortunate that we cannot legislate good taste. Not all speech is protected. Many forget that the US Constitution forbids only Congress from enacting laws limiting speech. Hence, we can be censored here. And you may be able to say, "F U", but yelling it might also be considered disturbing the peace. What is at issue in this thread is the unlawful exploitation of children; not the unfortunate annoyances that come with living in a free society. |
It is definatly a pain when you are looking just for adult because as you said certain words show up and even if it is an adult film,some of the titles have partiel "young" clues in it to tease you into thinking the bad video is there. You have to be very carefull. |
You know Guys Most European governments, despite claiming to be all for freedom of their people, are always looking for excuses to spy on their own citizens. So while you believe the police are looking for paedophiles they are actually looking at your private communications. Therefore, as N9UNQ said, be very careful UK Bob |
I don't want or like kiddy porn but I try and find young looking legal girls, ie small, petite young looking, but not prepubescent girls. It seems to be a difficult search to avoid both kiddy porn and big titted heffers |
awb555 It helps. UK Bob |
To overcome the problem with those wanting to download or search for child prorn using my IP I installed a sniffer which alerts me whenever key words are being used....so far I have fired three employees for inappropriate usage of the internet. |
Protecting Your Network Hi Windwalker I believe that you are perfectly within your rights to employ IP sniffers, etc. to protect your network system from employees inappropriate use, whether it is illegality, against work policy or using forbidden software. That said, those same sniffers can capture employees private data as well, such as a confidential private emails, credit card numbers (used when shopping during lunch time) and or various online account details. As an employer, you have to make sure that your "sniffer" has the narrow task of protection and not used, in anyway, to gather your employees private information, which you could be held liable for. UK Bob |
If my employees or anyone using my computer system doesn't like the rules that I lay down and/or the idea that I have a sniffer on the system then they can find employment elsewhere. The computer system is for work only not a toy for the employees to play with and they are told such when they get hired. |
Hi WW You said, quite rightly: Quote:
Quote:
However, if extra unintended confidential data is collected then timely deletion of that data should free you of any obligation. UK Bob |
My employees have no right to have any personal data on the companies computer system nor are they allowed to utilize the system for other than strict company business. One X employee, who I fired for the unauthorized usage of the system (He was downloading porn instead of doing his work) took me to the local labor board.... Not only did the labor board uphold my fireing him for this infraction but he had to pay all costs regarding the investigation by the labor board.....his name was also forwarded to the local RCMP for investigation in/as he had downloaded numerous kiddie porn and photos.... |
Hi WW It's obvious that your ex-employee is a pervert and somehow believed that he had a right to use your resources to indulge his perversity. Getting rid of someone like that from your employ is not only your right but also your duty. All the best for the future. UK Bob |
I use Kaspersky - NOTHING gets through |
Quote:
|
How does Kaspersky prevent the downloading of requested files? We're not talking about virii here. Meanwhile (Aug. 14): KINGSPORT, Tenn. (AP) — Investigators say a former Kingsport police officer accessed child pornography over wireless networks belonging to neighbors, businesses and a church. Richard Chandler is one of 72 people indicted in an investigation into an international child pornography network that prosecutors say used an online bulletin board called Dreamboard to access thousands of images and videos of sexually abused children. The federal search warrant alleges Chandler made 117 posts to the site, including twice when he was on duty. According to court papers, members used screen names rather than actual names and accessed the bulletin board via proxy servers, with Internet traffic routed through other computers to disguise a user's location. As an ex-cop busted for child porn, he should have a most interesting time in prison. |
Sleepless & Blackhorse 70V I am not sure what point "Ecky Thump" was trying to make but if you are both right in your interpretations then ET is a very raw and naive novice. Without making any comments on the case concerning the cop, it shows that the authorities can trace IP addresses via proxy servers, over bulletin boards and anything else that can be used to hide or disguise a perpetrator's computer which is used for illegal activities. UK Bob |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.