Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   Open Discussion topics (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/open-discussion-topics/)
-   -   kiddie porn (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/open-discussion-topics/1970-kiddie-porn.html)

LeeRoyX May 12th, 2010 04:55 AM

damn, kiddie porn is a gr8 problem and evil!
i would catch and kill those who do harm to children and those who film it

Orange County Ca October 13th, 2010 08:20 PM

In the U.S. I can stand on the corner and yell "F... Y.." because protecting that speech also protects other speech such as political.

My point being sometimes you have to take a little bad along with a ton of good.

Blackhorse 70V October 14th, 2010 07:28 AM

It is most unfortunate that we cannot legislate good taste.

Not all speech is protected. Many forget that the US Constitution forbids only Congress from enacting laws limiting speech. Hence, we can be censored here. And you may be able to say, "F U", but yelling it might also be considered disturbing the peace.

What is at issue in this thread is the unlawful exploitation of children; not the unfortunate annoyances that come with living in a free society.

N9UNQ March 27th, 2011 10:22 PM

It is definatly a pain when you are looking just for adult because as you said certain words show up and even if it is an adult film,some of the titles have partiel "young" clues in it to tease you into thinking the bad video is there. You have to be very carefull.

ukbobboy01 March 28th, 2011 11:51 PM

You know Guys

Most European governments, despite claiming to be all for freedom of their people, are always looking for excuses to spy on their own citizens.

So while you believe the police are looking for paedophiles they are actually looking at your private communications.

Therefore, as N9UNQ said, be very careful


UK Bob

groo March 29th, 2011 03:20 AM

I don't want or like kiddy porn but I try and find young looking legal girls, ie small, petite young looking, but not prepubescent girls. It seems to be a difficult search to avoid both kiddy porn and big titted heffers

ukbobboy01 March 30th, 2011 05:31 AM

awb555

It helps.


UK Bob

windwalker June 22nd, 2011 11:02 PM

To overcome the problem with those wanting to download or search for child prorn using my IP I installed a sniffer which alerts me whenever key words are being used....so far I have fired three employees for inappropriate usage of the internet.

ukbobboy01 June 23rd, 2011 04:05 AM

Protecting Your Network
 
Hi Windwalker

I believe that you are perfectly within your rights to employ IP sniffers, etc. to protect your network system from employees inappropriate use, whether it is illegality, against work policy or using forbidden software.

That said, those same sniffers can capture employees private data as well, such as a confidential private emails, credit card numbers (used when shopping during lunch time) and or various online account details.

As an employer, you have to make sure that your "sniffer" has the narrow task of protection and not used, in anyway, to gather your employees private information, which you could be held liable for.



UK Bob

windwalker June 23rd, 2011 07:52 PM

If my employees or anyone using my computer system doesn't like the rules that I lay down and/or the idea that I have a sniffer on the system then they can find employment elsewhere. The computer system is for work only not a toy for the employees to play with and they are told such when they get hired.

ukbobboy01 June 24th, 2011 05:34 AM

Hi WW

You said, quite rightly:
Quote:

The computer system is for work only not a toy for the employees to play with and they are told such when they get hired.
But I did say:
Quote:

those same sniffers can capture employees private data as well, such as a confidential private emails, credit card numbers (used when shopping during lunch time) and or various online account details
So unless you specifically ban online shopping, which would be considered unreasonable and not using the system as a toy, then using your "sniffer" to gather data other than to protect your network may be problematic.

However, if extra unintended confidential data is collected then timely deletion of that data should free you of any obligation.



UK Bob

windwalker June 24th, 2011 03:49 PM

My employees have no right to have any personal data on the companies computer system nor are they allowed to utilize the system for other than strict company business.
One X employee, who I fired for the unauthorized usage of the system (He was downloading porn instead of doing his work) took me to the local labor board....
Not only did the labor board uphold my fireing him for this infraction but he had to pay all costs regarding the investigation by the labor board.....his name was also forwarded to the local RCMP for investigation in/as he had downloaded numerous kiddie porn and photos....

ukbobboy01 June 25th, 2011 07:01 AM

Hi WW

It's obvious that your ex-employee is a pervert and somehow believed that he had a right to use your resources to indulge his perversity. Getting rid of someone like that from your employ is not only your right but also your duty.

All the best for the future.


UK Bob

Ecky Thump August 18th, 2011 03:40 AM

I use Kaspersky - NOTHING gets through

Sleepless August 18th, 2011 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ecky Thump (Post 364747)
I use Kaspersky - NOTHING gets through

If you think some security suite will protect you against images of childporn, then are sadly mistaken.

Blackhorse 70V August 18th, 2011 06:44 PM

How does Kaspersky prevent the downloading of requested files? We're not talking about virii here.

Meanwhile (Aug. 14):
KINGSPORT, Tenn. (AP) — Investigators say a former Kingsport police officer accessed child pornography over wireless networks belonging to neighbors, businesses and a church.
Richard Chandler is one of 72 people indicted in an investigation into an international child pornography network that prosecutors say used an online bulletin board called Dreamboard to access thousands of images and videos of sexually abused children.
The federal search warrant alleges Chandler made 117 posts to the site, including twice when he was on duty.
According to court papers, members used screen names rather than actual names and accessed the bulletin board via proxy servers, with Internet traffic routed through other computers to disguise a user's location.

As an ex-cop busted for child porn, he should have a most interesting time in prison.

ukbobboy01 August 19th, 2011 04:42 AM

Sleepless & Blackhorse 70V

I am not sure what point "Ecky Thump" was trying to make but if you are both right in your interpretations then ET is a very raw and naive novice.

Without making any comments on the case concerning the cop, it shows that the authorities can trace IP addresses via proxy servers, over bulletin boards and anything else that can be used to hide or disguise a perpetrator's computer which is used for illegal activities.


UK Bob


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.