Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > Open Discussion topics
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old August 20th, 2003
A reader, not an expert
 
Join Date: January 11th, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,613
stief has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by trap_jaw4 I like the idea of the open-source movement so I remained with LimeWire, especially since it's probably the best Gnutella client that runs on Linux.
Jens-Uwe got me wondering if the Linux kernel project has the best claim to the largest project that furthers the ideal of the digital commons. (Do you code for it too?)
Quote:
I'm not using LimeWire very often, except for the purpose of testing. I don't tend to find the content I want on Gnutella and when I upload stuff to Gnutella it is not reshared. So long I am trying to help making Gnutella a little better although it might be a little like fighting wind mills, given the attitude of certain vendors releasing badly written clients which fail to implement important new features (but add useless ones like proxy support instead, - God, I have written a proxy patch for LimeWire last year already.)
Hmm. Lots to think about here. "certain vendors" would include LW, and quixotic would describe many opensourcers, I guess. I'm interested in knowing what the important features would be that haven't been implemented (FT access?), but thought the proxy stuff would help the half of the network that is firewalled which seemed a major factor in so many downloads being interrupted. Your PFS patch was used; so did the proxy patch just get forgotten?

I wonder why your stuff isn't being reshared. If it's being leeched by other networks, I can see why a two-way path would be a more important priority, or do you think coding LW to make uploading as easy as downloads should be more important?

Sorry for the length; I guess I'm just asking what the important changes should be (I don't know enough to judge a "badly written" core), but cheers anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old August 20th, 2003
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2003
Posts: 1,118
trap_jaw4 is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by stief
Jens-Uwe got me wondering if the Linux kernel project has the best claim to the largest project that furthers the ideal of the digital commons. (Do you code for it too?)
I try to keep away from anything written in C whenever it's possible. (The linux kernel is far beyond me...)

Quote:
Hmm. Lots to think about here. "certain vendors" would include LW, and quixotic would describe many opensourcers, I guess. I'm interested in knowing what the important features would be that haven't been implemented (FT access?), but thought the proxy stuff would help the half of the network that is firewalled which seemed a major factor in so many downloads being interrupted. Your PFS patch was used; so did the proxy patch just get forgotten?
If "FT access" is "FastTrack access", I can tell you that it will never be implemented. LimeWire could be sued for reverse engineering the encrypted protocol (thanks to the DMCA).
I have the impression that 60%-70% of the network are firewalled (at least that's what my new gnutella crawler suggests). Proxies could help, but my patch didn't include the possibility to bind a port on a SOCKS proxy (to accept incoming connections). I just saw that uploading/downloading & gnutella connections via proxies are possible because my university was preventing direct connections to the gnutella network.

Quote:
I wonder why your stuff isn't being reshared. If it's being leeched by other networks, I can see why a two-way path would be a more important priority, or do you think coding LW to make uploading as easy as downloads should be more important?

Sorry for the length; I guess I'm just asking what the important changes should be (I don't know enough to judge a "badly written" core), but cheers anyways.
The next important changes are that the other vendors implement dynamic querying & partial filesharing.
After all the new features have been implemented that are currently under way (client-side leaf guidance in querying, out-of-band replies, NIO, improved alt-src-mesh) the next big thing could be THEX/TTH & a distributed hashtable but there is not much more LimeWire could do to improve downloads. Proxying is certainly not a solution for the problem with firewalled users. Public proxies are usually slow and many ISPs do not offer SOCKS proxies.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old August 20th, 2003
Novicius
 
Join Date: August 20th, 2003
Posts: 2
nettom is flying high
Default Why bother?

I am so new it would make you sick, or maybe just green. I love Limewire, cause its so easy.
If I ever reach geekhood, I hope I dont need complicated software , to prove how big my prowess is.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old August 21st, 2003
Disciple
 
Join Date: August 20th, 2003
Posts: 14
Pro Fools is flying high
Default (F.F.F) Flatulent Foolish Flamer)

[Edit]

[Utter crap removed]

Last edited by ursula; March 30th, 2004 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Limewire 4.12 is really starting to bother me. 19TbirdSC91 Connection Problems 1 September 19th, 2006 10:19 PM
Help me please! A pop up came up & i didnt bother reading it but now it wont download Watty17 Chat - Open Topics - The Lounge 1 August 29th, 2005 02:50 AM
Why bother Unregistered Open Discussion topics 0 April 18th, 2002 08:07 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.