![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() deepblue What you have just said has a certain ring of truth and I would like to believe that all these foreign government agencies, local/city authorities, colleges, etc. are just port scanning my IP address (or scanning a range of IP addresses). However, just seeing if you have port 6346 open doesn't seem to tell the whole story because if my port is open then what business is it of theirs? It seems to me that the reason for port scanning is just not only to see if ports are open but to look for vulnerable PCs to infect with a Trojan, that way your activities can be monitored and a report sent back to the Trojan's originator. Port scanning for port scanning sake makes no real sense for statistical purposes only, therefore I feel that there must be some other motive behind their constant port scanning activities. Finally, I will take your advice and not get too alarmed by what my various logs tell me, now that I have PeerGuardian. UK Bob |
| |||
![]() Dear All Over the past few days (21, 22 April) the PeerGuardian block list server was down, at the time I did not realise this and started my usual (early) weekend P2P-ing Friday morning I noticed that MS AntiSpyware found five instances of NS Keylogger on my PC, two of those instances I now believe were false positives (uninstallers): C:\Program Files\PeerGuardian2\unins000.exe C:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\unins000.exe However, the other three instances cannot be dismissed as easily, leading me to suspect that one of those "agencies" that are constantly crawling down the 6346 port, and are usually kept out by PG2, probably planted this keylogger. I believe I made a silly mistake in not realising that the block lists that my copy of PG2 used were solely online, so when the PeerGuardian server went offline, a window of vulnerability opened on my PC. I have now nailed this window shut, and in order to protect my PC, by updating my PG2 with locally installed block lists (from Blocklist.org) now I am no longer dependant on the online lists as I was (unknowingly) before. UK Bob |
| |||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
| ||||
![]() I have been using PG for some time now and have seen similar organizations being blocked from port 6346.Could it be someone inside the organization trying to use Limewire as we are and being blocked because of the ip address?For example someone from the City of Thunder Bay,ON Canada has continually tried to connect to my port and been blocked. I don't think the RIAA has any spies in Thunder Bay its just that all cities are on the blocklist. I have been using PG for over a year and continued to use the original program through their dispute over ownership. I see this mess is resolved now, is my PG up to date or do I need to download a new program? Thanks Dan Also I use PG alongside Sygate and it works fine |
| |||
![]() Dan Quote:
However, PG2 is now available so, I guess, that is the one you should be now using. UK Bob |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
when a port is busy like say 6346 what is another good port # to use for my other | Butterfly9 | LimeWire+WireShare Tips and Tricks | 0 | January 31st, 2007 11:47 AM |
My ISP blocks port 6346 | FreeStuffRules! | Connection Problems | 1 | January 27th, 2006 05:42 AM |
can't listen at port 6346 | madmapper82 | Support: General | 3 | August 21st, 2002 01:02 AM |
I'm being bombarded on port 6346! | Unregistered | General Windows Support | 1 | January 11th, 2002 09:40 AM |
?connect through a different port-not 6346? | ehamel | Connection Problems | 0 | October 31st, 2001 02:29 PM |