Searching make no sense at all .
 

If i search for j*nnifer l*pez . i get 325 result .
There is about 2 "lets get loud" 2 times in the list .


Now if i search for a song of her , "lets get loud"
I get 307 result , and 1 of them have 122 user hosting it .
5 other file with more than 10 user .

So why the hell when i search for j*nnifer l*pez , i dont see these file ??? Files in both search contain all the words "j*nnifer l*pez lets get loud"

Nobody got a clue?

Is there any special command for search?
To show all result for example???

Well I don't really see a problem. You got the results you were looking for, maybe not how you thought but it still worked. So now you know, if you can't find what your looking for, change up your search critieria and try again;).

See: Skills to continue downlds, Downld speeds, Searching, optimal performance (follow “ALL” the off-shoot links)

Well thanks for the anwser but im not sure how you say " i dont really see the problem "

In the search result of j*nnifer l*pez , i got 2 "lets g*t l*oud"

If i search for "lets g*t l*oud" i have 300 result .

And in the search of "lets g*t l*oud" , all files have j*nnifer l*pez in the file name .



How so the search show only 2 result of "lets g*t l*oud" when in fact there is more than 300 result ??

Thats kinda more than wierd .
:(

Well i guess you guys dont get the picture .
So i took 3 screenshot .

I hope its not againts the rule . Now please explain me how it can be???

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-3/973408/jlo.jpg



http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-3/973408/jlo2.jpg


http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-3/973408/jlo3.jpg


Now i hope you understand there is a major problem with this software .

Each one is a different size you'll notice. That's why they are separated. Files are grouped if they are identical in attributes. That's what enables you to downld from several hosts for a single downld.

Why are they a different size? Probably due to different bit rate & encoder used. Some might be stereo, some joined-stereo or mono, some might have been encoded using VBR & not CBR, & then ... some might be fake ( T3 Spammers; mp3 Bit-Rates Versus File Sizes.)

It looks to me like you've downlded several versions of the same song.

BTW we'd normally prefer you editing out the artist & title. Otherwise it's proof you're downlding copyright material. And that's in contravention of the forum rules. We don't want to know what you're downlding, just what happens that's all.

Im not a noob. I know all this .
This have nothing to do with the thread subject .


I think you dont understand at all what i meant .
At first , i tought nobody understood what i said , but after the screenshot , i cant believe you guys are not saying : "lol wtf is that , i just tested it myself , lmao , thats wierd ."

maybe you guys dint understand the first 2 screenshot are the result of the search : jenn*ifer l*opez

And the last one is the search result of Lets g*et l*oud .

This is not rocket sience .

Re: Searching make no sense at all .
 

The search is focussing on one thing. In your example, artist or title. Your search for a specific title will concentrate on that aspect. Your search for the artist will concentrate upon that aspect. A search has a certain amount of energy; it times out after a while. If sufficient results are found for the main aspect of the search, then you may miss out on some other results.

Also consider there might be some relevance to some not having id3 tags or the tags are different in such a way that different search criteria give different results.

Re: Re: Searching make no sense at all .
 

But look at the second screenshot . The song im looking for is there , but why this one is been chossen out of lot in the 3rd screenshot?

Why there is a lot of song name : "g*eT right" but only 1 "lets get *oud"
And if you search for those alone , you get like 250 more result for "lets get *oud "

How so it give more "*et right" than "lets g*t loud than"?

Is this "non sense search limitation" come from gnuetella or limewire?