Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > Open Discussion topics
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too.


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 3rd, 2006
Novicius
 
Join Date: April 3rd, 2006
Posts: 4
highkite is flying high
Default WiFi RIAA & Lawsuits

Having just googled the topic, I get the impression that the RIAA is worried about illegal downloading over unprotected WiFi routers -- probably mostly to laptops.

Advocates of intellectual property rights and advocates of free music might both be interested in these questions.

Downloading copyrighted material over an open wifi network is generally anonymous. However, I have thought of a few ways that the downloading user might get identified. I'm not sure of them though. Reality check requested. Also, general comments.

--The path name for a shared music folder might contain the user's name. E.G., <Bob Johson's documents\shared music\wilson pickett.mustang sally.mp3.> Gnutella clients don't normally display the path names to found files, but it seems likely that they are accessible. How interested would the RIAA be in that kind of information -- for the sake of pursuing their lawsuit program?

--Copy-protected songs downloaded from the iTunes Music Store contain the registered name and email address of the purchaser. (Possibly also true of other protected formats, like WMA.) As far as I know, this information would get shared along with the rest of the file. True? How interested would the RIAA be?

--A wirehead friend of mine tells me he thinks the wireless card ID number of the remote machine gets stored in the cache of the WiFi router, at least for awhile. This information might be remotely accessible, or accessible if the router is seized. True? Would the RIAA find this information useful?

--It's worth mentioning that some foolish users allow access to every imaginable document type on their hard disks, including personal and business correspondence. It's amazing what you see sometimes when you "browse host." Seems like these people ought to be warned, but I'm not sure that they would be listening.

Are there other possible identification methods I haven't thought of?

Such information might not be persuasive in every case, but it could help the RIAA nail the occasional perpetrator, I suppose. Comments?

Of course, the gnutella network should not be used for downloading or sharing copyrighted materials.

Cheers,

HK
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal - Open letter in regards to the RIAA lawsuits - UNI Sleepless General P2P Network Discussion 0 March 11th, 2007 06:13 AM
Best WiFi Router for UPnP? david.l.small Connection Problems 0 April 10th, 2006 11:42 AM
problem with proxy wifi gildasenplace Mac OSX 0 February 5th, 2006 08:36 AM
To protect against lawsuits heavensdemon Open Discussion topics 10 October 26th, 2005 02:37 PM
RIAA Lawsuits Continue - No End In Sight Megiddo Open Discussion topics 1 October 9th, 2003 09:57 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.