![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Rants Just say whatever must be said. (XoloX has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead.) |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() I have done a quick survey of the Gnutella network ("Bearshare", "Limewire", "Xolox",...) and the Fasttack network ("Morpheus", "KaZaA", "Grokster"). Fasttrack ("Morpheus") reports a very high user base (>100000 user) compared with Gnutella (>10000 user). Nevertheless, the search results on the Gnutella network seem to be more than on the Fasttrack network. My key results are: Even if Fasttrack reported over 22 times more users than Gnutella users (counted by the www.limewire.com Gnutella survey), Gnutella found over 8 times more search results. I suspect that the reported user number of the Fasttrack network is highly exaggerated. One other possibility is that the Fasttrack network is at least 22*8=176 times less efficient than Gnutella. Since there are no objective Fasttrack monitoring services, I severely doubt their numbers. Stefan Scheller ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TEST PROTOCOL Internet node: ADSL 768/136 kbps up/down, T-Online (Germany) Fasttrack Client: Morpheus 1.3.3 Started: 11.Sep.2001, 00:52 MESZ (GMT+2) reported: 629325 users, 75.7M files, 387 TByte Gnutella Client: Xolox 1.11 Started: 11.Sep.2001, 00:52 MESZ (GMT+2) reported (Statistics from www.limewire.com): about 28000 users Fasttrack reports 629325/28000 = 22.5 times more users than Gnutella. waiting until 01:02 MESZ (10 minutes total) until first search (network connections are allowed to stabilize) all searches are done without any restrictions (media type, adult) I used search words which are not so familiar, because Morpheus has a limit of 100 returned results. Search results after 1 minute of searching: "Heintje" -- Morpheus: 14 files, Xolox: 29 files "Alcazar" -- Morpheus: 39 files, Xolox: 80 files "space odyssey" -- Morpheus: 25 files, Xolox: 163 files "Kournikova" -- Morpheus: 61 files, Xolox: 826 files "musical offering" -- Morpheus: 0 files, Xolox: 17 files combined search results: Fasttack/Morpheus: 139 Gnutella/Xolox: 1115 Xolox found 1115/139 = 8 times more files than Morpheus. |
| |||
![]() The truth is the number of G-net users is very hard to gauge accurately. Most estimates are probably conservative. Also I think, being more complex, it attracts a more serious class of user and might have more people sharing files. |
| |||
![]() With gnuttela the search is not done with all the users, but with the users you are connected to (horizon is approx 500/1500 users depending of your setting) So the efficiency of the search is not related to the number of people using the network and cant be used to verify that fastrack is most used than gnuttela I believe that gnuttela is used by at least hundred of thousand of people every day far more than fasttrack. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
morpheus 4...fasttrack | swimkid | Morpheus (Windows) | 11 | July 24th, 2004 03:35 AM |
Morpheus connects to gnutella & fasttrack? | Unregistered | Morpheus (Windows) | 3 | August 29th, 2002 11:37 AM |
FastTrack, KaZaa, MusicCity, Morpheus coming under attack! Could LimeWire be next :( | Unregistered | Open Discussion topics | 0 | October 3rd, 2001 08:44 AM |
Beyond Gnutella: Fasttrack | Moak | XoloX Feature Request | 0 | September 20th, 2001 05:38 PM |
Gnutella vs. Fasttrack (Morpheus) | Unregistered | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 1 | September 10th, 2001 06:56 PM |