![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Rants Just say whatever must be said. (XoloX has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead.) |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
![]() Quote:
![]() As we can see here the best people are leaving... Thank you Vinnie, thank you Limewire... thank you for your flames and spyware! May be I should leave, too! Gnutella is dying! Morgwen |
| |||
![]() Remember the state it was in last year at this time? Gnutella seems to die regularly this time of year! ;-) Peers that don't keep up will just disappear - anyone remember TodeNode? It's really unfortunate to see Lime go the SpyWare route since they always seemed like a class act, but it's open source and if they don't make their users happy someone else will. As for BearShare, I stopped using it almost a year ago when it seemed to me Vinnie wanted to turn the entire gnet into FalcoNet (TM). |
| ||||
![]() Why? Yeah, I have a new job as pizza baker and for hot jamaican food on a seaside oil platform and it is not possible to get regular internet access here. No, I'm kidding. I expect that Gnutella development again is slowed down and found out that most developers are not interested or have not enough time to listen to my ideas. So I spent more time for other interesting nerd stuff... and watched more TV. ![]() |
| |||
![]() As Moak said: "thx [for XoloX]". I may seem a little critical of it at times, generally due to the frustration level of crashes. But hey: I'm use XoloX as my primary gnutella client, so that says *something* for it. At least, now that I'm running it under WinXP Pro, it doesn't cause my entire system to randomly reboot (as it does under Win2k Server). That makes it a little less infuriating to play with. If I may make one *tiny* suggestion, it would be to put a public ETA on the next release. Then, stick with it and release, whether you have all the features you wanted in there or not. I haven't seen an update since I started using this thing, and that's not good (considering the number of catastrophic-level crashes all of my friends and I are seeing). The longer you leave it in this state, the more people are going to permanently associate it with the word 'buggy'. I understand that its hard to get time to do these things; Lord knows I should have completely rewritten the Bliss32 interface by now. But, that's not a bug-type issue. When bugfixes are involved, I've found it best to make them quick and often (I've made bug-fix releases within 24 hours of learning of bugs in a new release and it *really* curbs the flames). In closing: I think you're off to a good start, and I'm sure everyone here is looking forward to seeing future releases of XoloX. Later! |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does Xolox still work with the latest Gnutella 1 protocol? | andrewwan1980 | Support: General | 0 | December 20th, 2006 01:55 AM |
Proposal for development of Gnutella (hashs) | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 61 | April 17th, 2002 08:35 AM |
gnutella development plans | Iamnacho | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 11 | March 9th, 2002 06:21 PM |
Note from XoloX development on Webserver 23/9/2001 | mvoosten | Support: General | 0 | September 23rd, 2001 09:53 AM |
Development Progress | swabby | Gnucleus (Windows) | 11 | May 31st, 2001 04:11 PM |