Gnutella Forums - Bearshare 2 block Xolox

Page 2 of 3

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)

- User Experience (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/user-experience/)

- - Bearshare 2 block Xolox (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/user-experience/7077-bearshare-2-block-xolox.html)

Xenomorph

March 7th, 2002 08:13 PM

i just located all the HTTP header info in XoloX

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.4
get /get/
HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: www.XoloX.nl
Referer: Gnutella

it would not be hard for me to change that to something totally different.

i could also check BearShare's connection info and possibly mimic it for each release they do. (no promisses though- it might not be possible)

i could change that stuff, and release a 1.16 client of both my Xenomorph dot Net version, and Zeropaid (if they want me to)...

cultiv8r

March 8th, 2002 05:14 AM

BS Blocks *all* v0.4 connections, so that would mean you'd have to connect with Xolox to a Gnutella deamon or something similar. Just FYI, I'll continue to support 0.4.

Morgwen

March 8th, 2002 05:16 AM

Yes,

I think all clients will support 0.4, perhaps Limewire not...

Morgwen

Xenomorph

March 10th, 2002 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unregistered
What you want to do is look for the hex 0D 0A end of line characters and just make them come after the hex 20 (space) so that it's a blank user agent line.
Screw vinnie, he can't control gnutella anymore cause morpheus gnucleus took over.
Now we have a open source major gnutella client, suck eggs vinnie!

0.4 connection uses 0A 0A (\n\n)

06. connection uses 0D 0A (\r\n)

there was only 0A 0A in XoloX.

ive tried different changes in the connection string, and i cant get XoloX to connect any after making the changes.

Xenomorph

March 10th, 2002 02:56 PM

here are the connection strings used by Gnutella clients:

Connecting Version 0.4 :

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.4\n\n

GNUTELLA OK\n\n

Connecting Version 0.6:

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.6\r\n
User-Agent: Program Name v1.0\r\n
\r\n

GNUTELLA/0.6 200 OK\r\n
User-Agent: Program Name v1.0\r\n
\r\n

GNUTELLA/0.6 200 OK\r\n
\r\n

Unregistered

March 10th, 2002 05:28 PM

or better yet, how do we block 0.6 connections?

Morgwen

March 12th, 2002 06:39 AM

Bearshare is blocking "ALL" other clients... their hostcaches only accept "OWN" bearshare nodes!

More input!

http://www.gnutellaforums.com/showth...8237#post28237

Morgwen

CycloCide

March 18th, 2002 04:22 PM

Re: Re: Bearshare 2 block Xolox

Quote:

Originally posted by Bullet
CycloCide

I remember you saying on these forums a while ago that if one Gnutella client actively blocks another Gnutella client then Gnutelliums would no longer continue to host or support the blocking client in question.Is this still the case?
I'm sure that Gnutelliums/Gnutella Forums still hold Xolox in high regard because for one thing this (Xolox)forum is still here despite Xolox being officially discontinued a good while ago.

Bullet

We're no longer supporting XoloX.

Unregistered

March 28th, 2002 09:51 PM

dear vinnie,
f' you
enough said

if xolox sux so bad why is it alive and kicking?
why is it's undevelpoing *** doin alright raw?
why not imitate xolox instead of eliminating xolox?
unless this internet thingy becomes a proprietary network maybe we should keep it open?
bearshare has deemed xolox the ******.
write better code not exculsionary code.
innovate otherwise open your mouth n masterbate

Unregistered

March 29th, 2002 11:27 PM

use this and block back
http://opensourcep2p.sf.net

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Page 2 of 3

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page