Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Discontinued Gnutella Client Forums > XoloX (Windows) > XoloX Feature Request
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

XoloX Feature Request Missing something? Let us know. XoloX has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead.


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 18th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default

Hi Moak!

Look what I have found...

Erst seine Sachen runterladen (dabei keine Uploads erlauben damit es zunächst schneller geht),

translation:

first get your stuff (do not allow uploads to get them faster)

He? Sorry Moak its the same thing only an other way!

Yes, you have to share your files but for modem users its better to share or to download! If there are clients that support modems in such a way you suggested, we can think about no modem freeloaders...

Morgwen
  #12 (permalink)  
Old October 18th, 2001
Moak's Avatar
Guest
 
Join Date: September 7th, 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 816
Moak is flying high
Default

Grrr... Morgwen ... read the whole sentence, don't take one part out of the documents context!!! The quoted sentence continues, it says": let Bearshare run at least the same time as you suck files". Meanwhile I wouldn't recommend "downloading only for short time" for Bearshare modem users. While people do it actually *sigh*, they abuse it too often. Xolox is better here, it does not allow missuse. *

But please feel free to translate the whole document. Yeah, would be awesome dude! *grin*

Morgwen, you're a fast poster! Cya, Moak

* = Xolox is better in that particular case, BUT it needs many bugfixes in the current version. Hope the programmers find time*******ial support soon.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default

Hi Moak!

For the last time...

I don´t think that all modem users should only download - but I think the best for a modem is only sharing or downloading, a modem user can also disconnect from gnet when he is sharing (a Mp3 takes between 30 - 90 minutes, without disconnecting), so the upload is also faster... later he can connect to gnet again!

I am lucky with my download/upload ratio 1 to 4! (TDSL)

With a modem my ratio was 30 to 1... I was trying to share...

So I think every user should think abut it...

Freeloading is a crime...

So if you free load, let the others free load, too!
Full bandwidth in both ways...

This is called sharing Moak!

Morgwen
  #14 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default

Hi Moak!

Forgot to say you are also a fast poster...

Morgwen
  #15 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Moak's Avatar
Guest
 
Join Date: September 7th, 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 816
Moak is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Morgwen dude
[...]I think the best for a modem is only sharing or downloading, a modem user can also disconnect from gnet when he is sharing [...] so the upload is also faster... later he can connect to gnet again!
Hi!

I really hope that future gnutella clients do not allow the type of "friendly freeloading" you describe. The problem is that this sounds good, but it is not... because the most freeloaders are not as friendly as you describe. Be honest, modem users act more like this: go online, quick suck your stuff, go offline and forget about anonymous gnutella, time is money.

I try to give you a short overview of my idea for a possible future gnutella client. Before I start let me say, I have NOTHING against free loading, freeloaders are NOT evil, blocking freeloaders is stupid! Sharing means giving, if you can give more than others, just do it, you make some souls happy.

The goals for a future client might be: more available files for modem AND high bandwith users, stop freeloading by making modem users a valuable part of the network. A short overview:
Servants are split up into super peers (hosts with DSL or high speed connection) and normal peers (modem users), AFAIK fasttrack uses this network topology allready. The normal peers do NOT connect to many other peers (to reduce gnutella backbone traffic for them, less or no traffic routing), but the super peers do (they are used as a kind of gnutella reflector, caching search results etc). All servants - even modem users - do spread often requested files all over the gnutella network: swarming of very small parts (e.g. 100 KB).
So when all modem users would share only 5% of their bandwith for uploading swarming parts, there would be a huge amount of extra bandwith = faster download for all, nearly no cost for modem users, necessity for freeloading eliminated. While modem users are idle or wait for downloads, they can automatically share with full bandwith. Okay this is theory and all clients have to provide parallel downloads from multiple hosts (as Xolox does).

I really don't want you to 'force' to think like I do... sorry for defending my point of view so much. I wanna show that I understand freeloading - yes it's human - but it is harming all of us.

Oki, thx for reading this endless discussion, Moaky Moak

Last edited by Moak; October 21st, 2001 at 07:08 PM.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Moak


Hi!

I really hope that future gnutella clients do not allow the type of "friendly freeloading" you describe. The problem is that this sounds good, but it is not... because the most freeloaders are not as friendly as you describe. Be honest, modem users act more like this: go online, quick suck your stuff, go offline and forget about anonymous gnutella, time is money.

I try to give you a short overview of my idea for a possible future gnutella client. Before I start let me say, I have NOTHING against free loading, freeloaders are NOT evil, blocking freeloaders is stupid! Sharing means giving, if you can give more than others, just do it, you make some souls happy.

The goals for a future client might be: more available files for modem AND high bandwith users, stop freeloading by making modem users a valuable part of the network. A short overview:
Servants are split up into super peers (hosts with DSL or high speed connection) and normal peers (modem users), AFAIK fasttrack uses this network topology allready. The normal peers do NOT connect to many other peers (to reduce gnutella backbone traffic for them), but the super peers do (they are used as a kind of gnutella reflector, caching search results etc). All servants - even modem users - do spread often requested files all over the gnutella network: swarming of very small parts (e.g. 100 KB).
So when all modem users would share only 5% of there bandwith for uploading swarming parts, there would be a huge amount of extra bandwith = faster download for all, nearly no cost for modem users, necessity for freeloading eliminated. Okay this is theory and all clients have to provide parallel downloads from multiple hosts (as Xolox does).

I really don't want you to 'force' to think like I do... sorry for defending my point of view so much. I wanna show that I understand freeloading - yes it's human - but it is harming all of us.

Oki, thx for reading this endless discussion, Moaky Moak
Hi Moak!

The Idea is very good... you should post this in our german forum, too!

But actually my way is the better one (i think so)...

All unfriedly freeloaders must know - you are killing the gnet...
so free load "only" friendly (as I suggested), until we have more clients like xolox (hate to write this, I am a bearsharer, but bearshare doesn´t support multiple downloads )

cu,

Morgwen
  #17 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Moak's Avatar
Guest
 
Join Date: September 7th, 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 816
Moak is flying high
Default

Hi Morgwen, thx for this discussion!
Yeah we should post a link to this thread.
You're the Bearshare moderator.

/Moak

PS: You like fullquotes, do you?
  #18 (permalink)  
Old October 20th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default Next discussion!

May be you have an idea for an other discussion...

No, I don´t really like full quotes I am only to lazy...

Morgwen
  #19 (permalink)  
Old October 20th, 2001
Moak's Avatar
Guest
 
Join Date: September 7th, 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 816
Moak is flying high
Default

I wonder that nobody wants to add something....
Meanwhile we can meet on IRCnet #xolox (or #bearshare.de if you prefer that channel, hehe).

So long, Moak
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 More Requests MicroSlob New Feature Requests 0 August 14th, 2006 05:25 AM
Requests? JeanGrey Chat - Open Topics - The Lounge 2 July 17th, 2006 07:33 AM
Requests ? Steve96 Open Discussion topics 1 January 9th, 2006 05:36 PM
how do i get more requests? henson Open Discussion topics 4 September 9th, 2005 05:07 PM
two more requests Unregistered XoloX Feature Request 0 October 25th, 2001 10:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.