Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Discontinued Gnutella Client Forums > XoloX (Windows) > XoloX Feature Request
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

XoloX Feature Request Missing something? Let us know. XoloX has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead.


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2001
Morgwen's Avatar
lazy dragon - retired mod
 
Join Date: October 14th, 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,927
Morgwen is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Moak


Hi!

I really hope that future gnutella clients do not allow the type of "friendly freeloading" you describe. The problem is that this sounds good, but it is not... because the most freeloaders are not as friendly as you describe. Be honest, modem users act more like this: go online, quick suck your stuff, go offline and forget about anonymous gnutella, time is money.

I try to give you a short overview of my idea for a possible future gnutella client. Before I start let me say, I have NOTHING against free loading, freeloaders are NOT evil, blocking freeloaders is stupid! Sharing means giving, if you can give more than others, just do it, you make some souls happy.

The goals for a future client might be: more available files for modem AND high bandwith users, stop freeloading by making modem users a valuable part of the network. A short overview:
Servants are split up into super peers (hosts with DSL or high speed connection) and normal peers (modem users), AFAIK fasttrack uses this network topology allready. The normal peers do NOT connect to many other peers (to reduce gnutella backbone traffic for them), but the super peers do (they are used as a kind of gnutella reflector, caching search results etc). All servants - even modem users - do spread often requested files all over the gnutella network: swarming of very small parts (e.g. 100 KB).
So when all modem users would share only 5% of there bandwith for uploading swarming parts, there would be a huge amount of extra bandwith = faster download for all, nearly no cost for modem users, necessity for freeloading eliminated. Okay this is theory and all clients have to provide parallel downloads from multiple hosts (as Xolox does).

I really don't want you to 'force' to think like I do... sorry for defending my point of view so much. I wanna show that I understand freeloading - yes it's human - but it is harming all of us.

Oki, thx for reading this endless discussion, Moaky Moak
Hi Moak!

The Idea is very good... you should post this in our german forum, too!

But actually my way is the better one (i think so)...

All unfriedly freeloaders must know - you are killing the gnet...
so free load "only" friendly (as I suggested), until we have more clients like xolox (hate to write this, I am a bearsharer, but bearshare doesn´t support multiple downloads )

cu,

Morgwen
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 More Requests MicroSlob New Feature Requests 0 August 14th, 2006 04:25 AM
Requests? JeanGrey Chat - Open Topics - The Lounge 2 July 17th, 2006 06:33 AM
Requests ? Steve96 Open Discussion topics 1 January 9th, 2006 04:36 PM
how do i get more requests? henson Open Discussion topics 4 September 9th, 2005 04:07 PM
two more requests Unregistered XoloX Feature Request 0 October 25th, 2001 09:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.