Search needs some options
 

search needs to be enhanced. Searching for m-zone, produced everything that had the word 'zone' and the letter 'm' anywhere. Enclosing the search string in quotations did nothing. There is a need to search exact string as it appears, nothing removed or separated. Needles to say, I didn't find what I was looking for coz the search produced thousands of wrong results

In the current implementation of the gnutella protocall, I believe anything that's not a-z, A-Z or 0-9 gets stripped from searches. Anything you could possibly use, besides boolean queries -which would just be turned into search terms-, is parsed out, probably because a lot of people do what you did and put quotes or whatnot in their query. This includes periods, plusses+, minuses-, exclemation points!, commas,, apersands&, astrixes*, brackets []{}, parentheses(), etc...

Adding searching options like boolean expressions or logical (+ -) operators would be cool, but until everyone adopts protocall v0.6 (which is still in developmental stages) these could only effect the searches that the program displays, not the way the search is performed. This means the searches won't be any faster and just as much traffic coming in, but the files diplayed will be filtered more at the cost of CPU overhead.

I agree to the first poster, Gnutella needs more search options.

At least some search-engine-like boolean operators (AND OR NOT) and something to search for exact phrases.

SIZE and such
 

As was stated in some other message, even if you can't enhace the search related to the title, you can add options like size, or type...

It's not so hard, is it?

Maggie.